S - Nederlandse Vereniging voor Klinische Neurofysiologie

80 MachielZwarts
3. Dumitru D, King JC, Zwarts MJ. Determinants of motor unit potential duration. Clin Neurophysiol
1999;110:1876-1882.
4. Dumitru D, Stegeman DF, Zwarts MJ. “Electric Sources and Volume Conduction” and Appendix- “The Leading/TrailingDipoleModelandNear-Field/Far-FieldWaveforms”,Ch.2,27-67.In:ElectrodiagnosticMedicine.Dumitru
D,Amato AM andZwartsMJ. 2nded.1524 pp. Philadelphia:HanleyandBelfus,Inc.2002.
5. Dumitru D, Zwarts MJ. “Needle Electromyography”, Ch. 7, 257-291. In: Electrodiagnostic Medicine. Dumitru
D, Amato AMandZwartsMJ. 2nded.1524 pp. Philadelphia: HanleyandBelfus, Inc.2002.
6. Finsterer J., Mamoli B., Fuglsang-Frederiksen A. Peak-ratio interference pattern analysis in the detection of
neuromuscular disorders.Electroenceph.Clin.Neurophysiol.105: 379-384 (1997)
7. Fuglsang-FrederiksenA.,ScheelU.,BuchthalF.Diagnosticyieldofanalysisofthepatternofelectricalactivity
andof individualmotorunit potentialsinmyopathy.J. Neurol.Neurosurg.Psych.39: 742-750 (1976)
8. GeiringerSR.Anatomiclocalization for needleelectromyography.Hanleyand Belfus.1999.
9. Gilchrist J.M., Nandedkar S.D., Stewart C.S., Massey J.M., Sanders D.B., Barkhaus P.E. Automatic analysis of
theelectromyographicinterferencepatternusingtheturns:amplituderatio.Electroenceph.Clin.Neurophysiol.70:
534-540 (1988)
10. Jongen P.J.H., Vingerhoets H.M., Roeleveld K., Stegeman D.F. Automatic decomposition electromyography in
idiopathicinflammatorymyopathies.J. Neurol.243: 79-85 (1996)
11. KincaidJC,PatraA,SchildJH.Theauditorycomponentoftheelectromyogram.MuscleandNerve,2001:1425.
12. Nandedkar S, St˚alberg EV, Sanders DB. “Quantitative EMG”, Ch 8, 293-356. In: Electrodiagnostic Medicine.
Dumitru D, Amato AMandZwartsMJ. 2nd ed.1524 pp. Philadelphia:HanleyandBelfus, Inc.2002.
13. Nirkko A.C., Rösler K.M., Hess C.W. Sensitivity and specificity of needle electromyography: a prospective
studycomparingautomatedinterferencepatternanalysiswithsinglemotorunitpotentialanalysis.Electroenceph.Clin.Neurophysiol.97:
1-10 (1995)
14. Sanders D.B., St˚alberg E.V., Nandedkar S.D. Analysis of the electromyographic interference pattern. J. Clin.
Neurophysiol.13: 385-400 (1996)
15. St˚albergE,NandedkarS.D.,SandersD.B.,FalckB.Quantitativemotorunitpotentialanalysis.J.Clin.Neurophysiol.13:
401-422 (1996)
16. St˚albergE. AAEMminimonograph#20. Macro EMG. Muscle &Nerve6: 619-630 (1983)
17. St˚alberg E., Chu J., Bril V., Nandedkar S., St˚alberg, Ericsson M. Automatic analysis of the EMG interference
pattern.Electroenceph.Clin.Neurophysiol.56: 672-681 (1983)
18. Stewart C.R., Nandedkar S.D., Massey J.M., Gilchrist J.M., Barkhaus P.E., Sanders D.B. Evaluation of an automaticmethodofmeasuringfeaturesofmotorunit
actionpotentials.Muscle & Nerve12: 141-148 (1989)
19. StrommenJA,DaubeJR.Determinantsofpaininneedleelectromyography.ClinNeurophysiol.2001,112:1414-
8.
20. Van der Hoeven JH, Zwarts MJ. Het EMG bij myopathie, consensus tekst Nederlandse Vereniging voor Klinische
Neurofysiologie. in: J.G. van Dijk, (ed): EMG voor de algemeen neuroloog, Boerhaave commissie, p.
175-190, (ISBN90-6767-449-4), 12 mei2000.
21. Willison R.G. Analysis of electrical activity in healthy and dystrophic muscle in man. J. Neurol. Neurosurg.
Psych.32: 386-394 (1964)
22. ZwartsMJ,StegemanDF.MultichannelsurfaceEMG:scientificbasisandclinicalutility.MuscleandNerve.28:
1-17, 2003.