01.03.2013 Views

International Polar Year 2007–2008 - WMO

International Polar Year 2007–2008 - WMO

International Polar Year 2007–2008 - WMO

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Fig.1.5-21 IPY<br />

<strong>2007–2008</strong> was<br />

officially closed<br />

on 12 June 2010,<br />

with the symbolic<br />

passing of the IPY<br />

flag from Jerónimo<br />

López-Martinéz, JC<br />

Co-Chair, to Gerlis<br />

Fugmann, APECS<br />

President, as Deliang<br />

Chen, ICSU Executive<br />

Director, and Elena<br />

Manaenkova, <strong>WMO</strong><br />

Assistant Secretary<br />

General, applaud.<br />

(Photo: Jon-Petter Reinertsen)<br />

110<br />

IPY 20 07–20 08<br />

The JC also served as a forum for new ideas for<br />

change in the IPY process. Every JC meeting had<br />

agenda items for discussion of such ‘new ideas.’ Some,<br />

like the idea of the ‘IPY Publication series’ introduced<br />

at JC-7, were only implemented to a limited extent, if<br />

at all. Others, like the establishment of the IPY archives<br />

(JC-6) or the endorsement of the Association of the<br />

Early Career Scientists (APECS–Chapter 4.3), were<br />

eventually picked up by more appropriate players.<br />

The role of the JC as the key IPY ‘vetting body’ was<br />

recognized widely by independent observers (Stirling,<br />

2007).<br />

The JC will most certainly be remembered for its<br />

three major achievements: 1) definition of the core IPY<br />

science based on 228 international projects reviewed<br />

and endorsed by the JC in 2005 and 2006; 2) initiation<br />

of a series of three consecutive major IPY conferences<br />

in 2008, 2010 and 2012 with their specific messages;<br />

and 3) being the main advocate of the IPY <strong>2007–2008</strong><br />

legacy based on JC recommendations for a way forward<br />

(Part 5). While the analogous bodies for the IPY-<br />

1, IPY-2 and IGY also aspired to similar achievements,<br />

none succeeded in completing all three.<br />

In fulfilling its role in IPY as defined by ICSU and<br />

<strong>WMO</strong> in 2004, the JC never acted alone. Many other<br />

players helped steer the large IPY flagship to its<br />

destination: the IPO, national committees, lead IPY<br />

sponsors, and numerous supporting agencies and<br />

organizations. The activities of the IPY subcommittees<br />

were particularly noteworthy in: identifying and filling<br />

observational gaps within IPY observing components<br />

(Part 3) that eventually led to the creation of the IPY<br />

Space Task Group; developing IPY data management<br />

strategy (Chapter 3.11); and enhancing public and<br />

media interest and participation in IPY (Part 4).<br />

Assessing the IPY implementation in 2007–2009, the<br />

61st session of <strong>WMO</strong> Executive Council (June, 2009)<br />

“. . . noted with satisfaction the remarkable progress<br />

in the implementation of IPY and highly appreciated<br />

the work of the <strong>WMO</strong>/ICSU Joint Committee (JC) for<br />

IPY, its Subcommittees, IPY <strong>International</strong> Programme<br />

Office, and over 50,000 participants of the IPY projects<br />

from more than 60 countries. The Council was pleased<br />

to note that during the IPY period the researchers<br />

made fundamental scientific discoveries, developed<br />

new methods and tools, advanced interdisciplinary<br />

and international links in polar science and, most<br />

importantly, gained new understanding of the role of<br />

the <strong>Polar</strong> Regions in the total Earth system. The Council<br />

recognized that the success of IPY had inspired many

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!