01.03.2013 Views

International Polar Year 2007–2008 - WMO

International Polar Year 2007–2008 - WMO

International Polar Year 2007–2008 - WMO

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

data management structures. Unfortunately, many<br />

of these robust data management structures are<br />

very independent or siloed and do not necessarily<br />

collaborate with other systems.<br />

IPY Data Strategy<br />

As IPY began, the Data Subcommittee laid out a<br />

basic four-point data strategy briefly described in<br />

points A to D below, and summarized in Fig. 3.11-2.<br />

A. Identify and share the data (Identification).<br />

Goal: all metadata by March 2009<br />

All projects should create brief descriptions of<br />

their IPY data in a standard metadata format in<br />

accordance with the IPY Metadata Profile. Metadata<br />

should be provided to the IPY Metadata Portal at<br />

the GCMD (http://gcmd.nasa.gov/portals/ipy/) or at<br />

an appropriate national registry. National registries<br />

should enable ready discovery of their holdings<br />

through the GCMD either through metadata sharing,<br />

such as the Open Archives Initiative Protocol for<br />

Metadata Harvesting (OAI-PMH) or open search<br />

(ISO23950) protocols. National data coordinators<br />

greatly facilitate this process.<br />

B. Serve the data in interoperable frameworks<br />

(Availability).<br />

Goal: ongoing demos of integration, all data available<br />

March 2010<br />

All IPY projects should make their data fully and<br />

openly available in standard data formats through<br />

standard data access mechanisms. Data may be served<br />

by individual projects or by designated archives, but<br />

the data must be linked directly to the discovery level<br />

metadata described above. IPY projects and data<br />

centers should work to make their data as interoperable<br />

as practical and to work with other projects and<br />

data centers to develop targeted interoperability<br />

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012<br />

IDENTIFICATION<br />

AVAILABILITY<br />

COORDINATION<br />

arrangements. Projects and centers should also<br />

participate in global interoperability initiatives, notably<br />

the Global Earth Observing System of Systems (GEOSS)<br />

and the <strong>WMO</strong> Information System (WIS).<br />

C. Preserve the data (Preservation).<br />

Goal: all data in secure archives by March 2012<br />

All IPY data and associated documentation<br />

(including metadata) should be deposited in secure,<br />

accessible repositories within three years after the end<br />

of the IPY. Archives should follow the ISO-Standard<br />

Open Archival Information System Standard Reference<br />

Model. National governments and international<br />

organizations must develop means to sustain archives<br />

over the long-term.<br />

D. Coordinate the process (Coordination).<br />

Goal: ensure broad international collaboration and<br />

agreement on standards<br />

Nations should designate national data coordinators<br />

and participate actively in the IPYDIS to<br />

ensure the other elements of the strategy are met.<br />

Note the original strategy envisioned the coordination<br />

role fading out as data were secured, but actually<br />

coordination still needs to continue for several years.<br />

The JC endorsed this strategy in October<br />

2007. Subsequently, the JC, the IPO and the Data<br />

Subcommittee actively urged participating countries<br />

to designate national data coordinators and<br />

support IPY data archives. To date, 16 countries have<br />

designated national IPY data coordinators. Some<br />

nations formally designated IPY coordinators through<br />

national IPY Committees, research councils or other<br />

agencies. Because some IPY countries are only active<br />

in the Antarctic, their SCADM representatives act as<br />

de facto IPY coordinators. Many of these coordinators<br />

were not designated until well after IPY began and<br />

some will not continue very long after the IPY.<br />

PRESERVATION<br />

Fig. 3.11-2. Timeline<br />

for implementing the<br />

IPY Data Strategy<br />

o b s e r v I n g s Y s t e m s a n d d a t a m a n a g e m e n t 461

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!