01.03.2013 Views

International Polar Year 2007–2008 - WMO

International Polar Year 2007–2008 - WMO

International Polar Year 2007–2008 - WMO

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

530<br />

IPY 20 07–20 08<br />

of multidisciplinary observations to establish the<br />

status of the polar environments during the ‘IPY era’<br />

that would become a baseline for measuring future<br />

change. The status theme specifically included polar<br />

issues related to biodiversity and to polar residents,<br />

their health, and social and economic well-being.<br />

The examples advanced during the planning process<br />

included establishing the status of the high latitude<br />

ocean circulation and composition, documenting<br />

polar ecosystem structure and function variability<br />

through space and identifying the contemporary<br />

factors of social cohesion and values for polar societies.<br />

The IPY benchmark measurements produced<br />

new baselines of polar environmental conditions,<br />

biodiversity and ecosystem processes, status of<br />

the polar oceans, uniquely coordinated satellite<br />

observations of the polar environments and new<br />

measurements of the polar permafrost and the polar<br />

atmosphere. Determining spatial and temporal<br />

status of the environmental change, understanding<br />

the connections between the change and human<br />

impacts and understanding polar-global linkages<br />

– cannot possibly be addressed with two years of<br />

data. Understanding these complex connections<br />

will require sustained, global monitoring integrated<br />

across a wide range of disciplines.<br />

IPY <strong>2007–2008</strong> built on the wealth of new scientific<br />

discoveries that catalyzed the development of<br />

sustained observing systems. For example, because<br />

of IPY, atmospheric observations are now taken at a<br />

consortium of research stations, employing standardized<br />

measurement techniques to monitor meteorological<br />

parameters, greenhouse gases, atmospheric<br />

radiation, clouds, pollutants, chemistry, aerosols and<br />

surface energy balances (Chapters 3.4 and 3.5). Similarly,<br />

the oceanographic community has effectively<br />

used IPY projects to address some of the major gaps<br />

in global ocean monitoring systems, to develop novel<br />

polar technologies as the core of efforts in the Arctic<br />

and Southern Oceans, and to link different monitoring<br />

systems run by individual agencies or nations into<br />

much more extensive and coordinated network (Bates<br />

and Alverson, 2010; Figs. 5.1-1 and 5.1-2).<br />

Early insights are emerging from IPY baseline<br />

measurements. For example, IPY baseline permafrost<br />

observations were based on borehole temperature<br />

measurements (Chapter 2.7). The analysis of the<br />

permafrost temperature data in the borehole network<br />

improved during IPY demonstrated that the evolution<br />

of the permafrost temperatures is spatially variable<br />

and that the signs of warming of the upper permafrost<br />

differ in magnitude regionally. Simultaneously, new<br />

observing systems, particularly in biological sciences,<br />

have begun. Integrated, systematic observations<br />

of key species and habitats as part of long-term<br />

circumpolar monitoring programs are beginning<br />

to take shape and will be increasingly required to<br />

underpin management of ecosystem health and<br />

services in the face of the combined future impacts<br />

of climatic change and economic development in the<br />

polar regions.<br />

IPY <strong>2007–2008</strong> was organized at a critical time.<br />

The Arctic and Antarctic Peninsula are known to be<br />

warming much faster than the rest of the globe (IPCC,<br />

2007). Many impacts are already affecting biodiversity<br />

and ecosystem processes, some of which are likely<br />

to have global consequences. The international science<br />

community documented changes, deepened<br />

understanding of their causes, established baselines<br />

against which future changes can be measured, and<br />

projected future scenarios including local and global<br />

impact (Chapter 5.2; Dahl-Jensen et al., 2009; SWIPA,<br />

2009; Turner et al., 2009a). Key to establishing these<br />

ecological benchmarks were biodiversity monitoring,<br />

data management and reporting through the development<br />

of integrated, ecosystem-based monitoring<br />

plans, coordinated, web-based data management<br />

products and targeted reporting tools (e.g. development<br />

of biodiversity indicators and indices). One<br />

important result is the intensified discussions on the<br />

urgent need for ongoing international, integrated<br />

monitoring systems of the <strong>Polar</strong> systems.<br />

The facilities and instruments were improved at<br />

significant number of meteorological polar stations<br />

during IPY to provide basic meteorological variables<br />

and more reliable aerosol, chemistry, pollutant,<br />

greenhouse gases, fluxes, radiation, cosmic rays, ozone<br />

and carbon cycle measurements. Fluxes of charged<br />

particles observed in the atmosphere are the evidence<br />

to unusually profound and long-lasting solar activity<br />

minimum (Kotlyakov et al., 2010). To improve the data<br />

coverage in Antarctica, the meteorological observing<br />

network was extended by deploying new automatic<br />

weather stations at the location of the former manned

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!