01.03.2013 Views

International Polar Year 2007–2008 - WMO

International Polar Year 2007–2008 - WMO

International Polar Year 2007–2008 - WMO

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

nations to continue IPY projects beyond the IPY…“<br />

(<strong>WMO</strong>, 2009). This message echoed the sentiments<br />

from the October 2008 ICSU General Assembly at<br />

which IPY was described as “a resounding success”<br />

and its implementation was lauded as an effective<br />

model from which to draw lessons. ICSU members<br />

agreed “to extend deep appreciation to the members<br />

of the IPY Joint Committee, its subsidiary groups, and<br />

the <strong>International</strong> Programme Office for their tireless<br />

work in making the IPY a major success . . .”<br />

The JC indeed fulfilled most of its tasks as stipulated<br />

in its Terms of References, established by ICSU and<br />

<strong>WMO</strong> in November 2004. It developed an overall<br />

implementation plan for IPY <strong>2007–2008</strong> as a network<br />

of ‘core’ projects in research, data management,<br />

education and outreach. It worked hard to encourage<br />

and support its subcommittees to develop IPY<br />

data policy and strategies to stimulate interest in<br />

polar research and polar regions among students,<br />

educators, general public and decision-makers. It<br />

organized several ‘open meetings’ (Open Consultative<br />

Forums) for the participating IPY scientists and science<br />

planners, and it reached out to many organizations<br />

and groups of stakeholders to encourage their<br />

participation in IPY (Chapters 5.3, 5.4). On the other<br />

hand, the JC was not very successful in raising<br />

additional funds for IPY planning and coordination,<br />

and for keeping a close supervision of its more than<br />

200 constituent international projects and many other<br />

events.<br />

It is difficult to compare the role of the JC in IPY<br />

<strong>2007–2008</strong> to that of CSAGI in IGY during the 1953–<br />

1958 period. The two guiding committees had radically<br />

different levels of available resources, administrative<br />

and governmental support, and the number of powerful<br />

personalities involved (Chapter 1.1). Future historians<br />

may discover JC shortcomings, but also as yet<br />

unseen successes. The unfinished tasks of the JC and<br />

of the entire IPY <strong>2007–2008</strong> process will be addressed<br />

in more detail in the Epilogue.<br />

Fig.1.5-22 Closing<br />

of IPY <strong>2007–2008</strong><br />

at the conclusion<br />

of the Oslo Science<br />

Conference, 12 June<br />

2010. Left to right:<br />

Elena Manaenkova<br />

(Assistant Secretary<br />

General, <strong>WMO</strong>),<br />

Michael Sparrow<br />

(SCAR), Jenny<br />

Baeseman (APECS),<br />

Volker Rachold<br />

(IASC), David Carlson<br />

(IPO), Jerónimo<br />

López-Martínez<br />

(JC), Deliang Chen<br />

(Executive Director,<br />

ICSU, standing at the<br />

podium).<br />

(Photo: Igor Krupnik)<br />

P l a n n I n g a n d I m P l e m e n t I n g I P Y 2 0 0 7–2 0 0 8 111

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!