01.03.2013 Views

International Polar Year 2007–2008 - WMO

International Polar Year 2007–2008 - WMO

International Polar Year 2007–2008 - WMO

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

PA R T T WO: IPY SCIENCE PR O G R A M<br />

2.11 Human Health<br />

Lead Authors:<br />

Alan J. Parkinson and Susan Chatwood<br />

Contributing Authors:<br />

James Allen, Eva Bonefeld-Jorgensen, Bert Boyer, Dionne Gesink, Wilmar Igl, Rhonda<br />

Johnson, Anders Koch, Merete Laubjerg, Marya Levintova, Brian McMahon, Gerry<br />

Mohatt, Jay Van Oostdam, Aria Rautio, Boris Revich, Manon Simard and Kue Young<br />

Reviewers:<br />

Chris Furgal and Russel Shearer<br />

Introduction and Overview<br />

While health research is not new to international<br />

collaborations, <strong>International</strong> <strong>Polar</strong> <strong>Year</strong> (IPY) 2007–<br />

2008 was the first IPY to include human dimensions<br />

as a thematic area of study. The theme for the human<br />

dimension was established to “investigate the<br />

cultural, historical, and social processes that shape the<br />

sustainability of circumpolar human societies, and to<br />

identify their unique contributions to global cultural<br />

diversity and citizenship” (Rapley et al., 2004).<br />

This chapter will introduce the circumpolar health<br />

context, and then provide an overview of the history<br />

which informed health research activities during IPY<br />

<strong>2007–2008</strong> and highlight the activities which arose as<br />

a result of this initiative.<br />

The IPY activities related to human health primarily<br />

focused on polar regions with permanent human<br />

inhabitants (Fig. 2.11-1). Nevertheless, it should be<br />

recognized that locations such as Svalbard and<br />

Antarctica are inhabited by transient populations,<br />

and have rich histories in science and exploration.<br />

The legacy lives on as these populations continue<br />

to be primarily made up of scientists, explorers and<br />

occupational workers (including passing shipping<br />

traffic in Antarctica and coal miners in Svalbard). Both<br />

Antarctica and Svalbard have international treaties<br />

which support an environment for international<br />

activity. Despite the high level of scientific activity<br />

in these regions, scientific programs that explore<br />

the human health of these populations were<br />

underdeveloped during IPY. Human health needs<br />

in these populations tend to focus on emergency<br />

medicine, telehealth, rescue and expedition medicine<br />

and human response to isolation, cold and remote<br />

environments. Populations are small, so studies tend<br />

to be descriptive or qualitative. In some instances,<br />

human health research at the remote polar stations has<br />

been used to inform and better understand elements<br />

of human behavior in space (http://humanresearch.<br />

jsc.nasa.gov/analogs/analog_antarctica.asp).<br />

Communities such as Argentinean Esperanza Base in<br />

Antarctica and Longyearbyen in Svalbard have family<br />

residents, and medical services tend to be based on<br />

standards of the nation state: Argentina for the base<br />

in Antarctica and Norway in Svalbard. Each of these<br />

locations focuses on acute care and utilizes a medivac<br />

system to relocate individuals who are no longer<br />

able to work for any medical reason. Individuals with<br />

chronic conditions tend to self select and do not<br />

relocate to these remote locations.<br />

Although substantial progress has occurred in the<br />

health of circumpolar peoples over the past 50 years,<br />

considerable disparities still exist across different<br />

regions and populations; these disparities tend to<br />

predominate in Indigenous populations (Young and<br />

Bjerregaard, 2008). Indicators such as life expectancy<br />

at birth (LE 0 ) and infant mortality capture these<br />

regional differences. In North America, LE 0 for the<br />

State of Alaska is the same as that of the rest of the<br />

United States. For Alaska Natives, however, there is a<br />

gap of about 5 years. In the three northern territories<br />

of Canada, the values decline as the proportion of<br />

Indigenous people increases, such that there is a<br />

difference of 11 years between the territory of Nunavut<br />

and the Canadian national value. In Scandinavia, there<br />

is essentially no difference between the northern<br />

and the national LE 0 . Russia as a country is suffering<br />

s C I e n C e P r o g r a m 335

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!