01.03.2013 Views

International Polar Year 2007–2008 - WMO

International Polar Year 2007–2008 - WMO

International Polar Year 2007–2008 - WMO

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

2006/2007, 2007/2008, 2008/2009 and 2009/2010.<br />

When setting local ice and weather observations,<br />

village monitors were asked, at a minimum, to report<br />

daily temperature, wind direction, wind speed and<br />

the ice condition at each location. They were also<br />

encouraged to add local details they believed were<br />

important, such as data on subsistence activities;<br />

marine mammals, birds and terrestrial species;<br />

community events; and personal travel across the<br />

observation area (Fig. 3.10-10). All village monitors<br />

were also asked to include local terms, place names<br />

and key descriptions in their respective native<br />

languages whenever possible. This resulted in a more<br />

nuanced, contextualized and community-vetted<br />

documentation of indigenous knowledge and the<br />

use of ice. The age of monitors varied from 33 to 84,<br />

with the main group in the 50s and 60s age-group.<br />

Altogether, local SIKU observations in 2006–2009<br />

produced a dataset of more than 150 monthly logs<br />

from nine communities totalling several hundred<br />

pages. It constitutes a unique database of its kind on<br />

local ice and weather conditions on the ground, but<br />

also on subsistence activities, communal life, personal<br />

travelling and the status of environmental knowledge<br />

in several communities during the IPY era.<br />

New and improved knowledge. The project<br />

offered a unique window to learn how indigenous ice<br />

and weather monitoring is organized and to identify<br />

the key parameters of sea ice dynamics as directed<br />

by indigenous hunters. For example, local monitors<br />

identify the ice not only by its age, thickness, type, etc.<br />

(as ice scientists also do), but also by its history during<br />

a particular ice season; how many times it was broken<br />

and refrozen and even by its geographic origin. In the<br />

Bering Strait region, hunters can detect where the<br />

incoming ice has originated, whether it carries game<br />

(or not) and whether it is safe and stable to travel. On<br />

St. Lawrence Island, hunters distinguish four to five<br />

different ‘waves’ of the passing spring ice, according<br />

to their origin, whereas on the scientists’ scale it is just<br />

one single ‘spring break-up’ period.<br />

Hunters also use several ‘proxy’ indicators to judge<br />

Fig. 3.10-9. Two<br />

hunters watch for<br />

seals from the top of<br />

ice pressure ridge.<br />

Gambell, St. Lawrence<br />

Island, Alaska,<br />

February 2008.<br />

(Photo: Igor Krupnik)<br />

o b s e r v I n g s Y s t e m s a n d d a t a m a n a g e m e n t 445

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!