01.03.2013 Views

International Polar Year 2007–2008 - WMO

International Polar Year 2007–2008 - WMO

International Polar Year 2007–2008 - WMO

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

14<br />

IPY 20 07–20 08<br />

at the same Danish Meteorological Institute. It completed<br />

its service on 31 December 1950, 17 years after<br />

the end of IPY-2, by producing a Bibliography of some<br />

2,000 IPY-2 publications, and brief overview of its organization<br />

and implementation (Laursen, 1951).<br />

Despite the efforts of the CPY, neither a special<br />

series nor a uniform template for the IPY-2 publication<br />

was established and each participating nation<br />

presented the results of its program at will in English,<br />

German and/or in French, but also in Russian, Polish,<br />

Norwegian, Danish, Italian, Spanish, Finnish and<br />

Portuguese (Laursen, 1951; Elzinga, 2009, 2010b).<br />

Overall, IPY-2 is a story of great perseverance in the<br />

time of world economic depression and political<br />

uncertainty. It was completed thanks in large part<br />

to the generosity of a few outside donors, such<br />

as the <strong>International</strong> Association of Meteorology,<br />

<strong>International</strong> Association of Terrestrial Magnetism and<br />

Electricity, Carnegie Institution and the Rockefeller<br />

Foundation (Elzinga, 2009; Laursen, 1982), despite<br />

global economic crisis and the resulting lack of muchneeded<br />

funding in many nations like Canada, U.K. and<br />

the U.S.A.<br />

For whatever reasons, the post-1933 process<br />

suffered from repeated delays in the processing<br />

and publication of the data collected. La Cour once<br />

estimated that it would take five years to ensure the<br />

legacy of IPY-2 (Elzinga, 2009). But six years went<br />

by without any international meeting or major<br />

presentation, until World War II broke out in 1939 and<br />

buried any further hopes. By the time the Liquidation<br />

Commission was established in 1946 to complete the<br />

unfinished tasks of IPY-2, it was too late to re-energize<br />

the polar science community. Perhaps, that feeling of<br />

unfinished mission contributed to a new drive for the<br />

‘third’ IPY and to cutting the time between the two<br />

initiatives from 50 to 25 years. It also explained why the<br />

IGY planners were so keen in promoting the results of<br />

IPY-2 in publications related to their venture 25 years<br />

later (Bartels, 1959; Beynon, 1959; Brooks, 1959; Paton,<br />

1959; Vestine and Nagata, 1959).<br />

<strong>International</strong> Geophysical <strong>Year</strong>/IGY:<br />

1957–1958<br />

Of all IPY initiatives, the third IPY, which eventually<br />

became the <strong>International</strong> Geophysical <strong>Year</strong> 1957–<br />

1958, due to its global geographic scope, has the bestdocumented<br />

chronology and the least controversial<br />

origination story. The idea of holding a new polar<br />

year in response to recent progress in polar science<br />

and technology was put forward on 5 April 1950 by<br />

Lloyd Berkner (1905–1967), ionospheric physicist and<br />

then executive secretary of the U.S. Research and<br />

Development Board. 23 He did so at a small dinner<br />

party that honored visiting British geophysicist<br />

Sydney Chapman (1888–1970) at James van Allen’s<br />

private house near Washington, D.C. (Chapman, 1953;<br />

Good, 2010; Jones, 1959; Korsmo, 2007, 2009). In that<br />

first deliberation, Chapman observed that the years<br />

1957–1958 would correspond with the maximum of<br />

solar activity; so, a date was chosen to mark a 25-year<br />

interval since IPY-2.<br />

People who proposed the idea for a new polar year<br />

were well positioned in the science hierarchy 24 ; many<br />

of them also shared personal memories of the IPY-2<br />

era. Several other veterans of IPY-2 became soon active<br />

in the planning and implementation of IGY. 25 The<br />

proposal for the ‘third polar year’ was advanced with<br />

a remarkable speed. A month later, in May 1950, the<br />

scientific aspects of the new initiative were discussed<br />

at a meeting at the Naval Rocket Station at Inyokern,<br />

China Lake, in California (Nicolet, 1982; Korsmo, 2007)<br />

and in July 1950 it was endorsed by the international<br />

conference on the Physics of the Ionosphere held at<br />

the Pennsylvania State College (Penn State), also in the<br />

U.S. In September 1950, Berkner and Chapman formally<br />

brought their proposal for the new polar year to the<br />

Mixed Commission on the Ionosphere of ICSU, a body<br />

comprising representatives from the <strong>International</strong><br />

Union for Scientific Radio (URSI), <strong>International</strong><br />

Astronomical Union (IAU) and the <strong>International</strong> Union<br />

for Geodesy and Geophysics (IUGG). The Commission<br />

endorsed the idea and forwarded it to the respective<br />

Unions; all approved it. 26 The proposal was then<br />

considered by the Bureau (officers) of ICSU in May 1951<br />

and was referred to the ICSU Executive Board. A small<br />

‘preparatory committee’ was charged to supervise the<br />

process. A large segment of the international science<br />

community was thus quickly made aware of the plans

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!