01.03.2013 Views

International Polar Year 2007–2008 - WMO

International Polar Year 2007–2008 - WMO

International Polar Year 2007–2008 - WMO

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

the majority of the observations performed during<br />

IPY. For the Northern Hemisphere, U.S.A., Canadian,<br />

Norwegian, Swedish, Russian and European agencies<br />

made substantial funding contributions. Several nations<br />

took on leadership in several of the IPY permafrost<br />

cluster projects. Norway took on a prominent<br />

role in temperature and periglacial observations and<br />

national database development in Norway, Svalbard<br />

and Iceland. Germany coordinated coastal permafrost<br />

observations and the drilling of several deep holes in<br />

Russia. Sweden played an important role in coordinating<br />

research on permafrost carbon pools. Portugal<br />

and Spain contributed with great enthusiasm to permafrost<br />

research with their projects in Antarctica and<br />

their outreach efforts strengthened the overall polar<br />

research of those two nations.<br />

IPY provided a unique opportunity to build on<br />

existing permafrost and periglacial research in the<br />

Antarctic, with development of new sites and mapping<br />

efforts. Argentina, Brazil, Bulgaria, Italy, New Zealand,<br />

Portugal, Russia, South Africa, Spain, Sweden, U.K.<br />

and U.S.A. continued or expanded their activities. The<br />

10-year European PACE project data were reviewed<br />

(Harris et al., 2009). In non-polar regions European<br />

countries continued the PERMOS (Vonder Mühll<br />

et al., 2008) network in Switzerland. In Asia, China,<br />

Mongolia, Kazakhstan and Japan continued on-going<br />

and developed new permafrost observations (see<br />

below). Most participating countries provided funding<br />

through national projects.<br />

The establishment of the permafrost thermal<br />

snapshot in the TSP project primarily confirms large<br />

differences between marine and continental regions,<br />

and between bedrock and sedimentary sites, lowlands<br />

and mountains mainly in the Northern Hemisphere<br />

(Smith et al., 2010; Romanovsky et al., 2010 a,b; and<br />

Christiansen et al., 2010). Temperature trends from<br />

pre-IPY existing boreholes allow us to conclude that<br />

the evolution of the permafrost temperatures is<br />

spatially variable and that the warming of the upper<br />

permafrost differs in magnitude from region to region,<br />

as well as between bedrock and sedimentary regions<br />

according to the Northern Hemisphere TSP research.<br />

This highlights the need for continued acquisition of<br />

a baseline dataset such as the one developed by the<br />

TSP, but also for integration with climate monitoring<br />

and for sustained observations over many decades.<br />

The Carbon Pools in Permafrost (CAPP) project<br />

Fig. 2.7-2. The Arctic<br />

coastal zone depicted<br />

as the climatesensitive<br />

region of<br />

the Arctic in which<br />

human activity<br />

and current rapid<br />

change intersect.<br />

Observatories in<br />

the coastal zone<br />

offer the potential<br />

for combined<br />

multidisciplinary<br />

work in a socioeconomically<br />

relevant<br />

milieu.<br />

(Graphic courtesy of the<br />

Arctic Centre, University of<br />

Groningen, Netherlands)<br />

s C I e n C e P r o g r a m 257

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!