01.03.2013 Views

International Polar Year 2007–2008 - WMO

International Polar Year 2007–2008 - WMO

International Polar Year 2007–2008 - WMO

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

526<br />

IPY 20 07–20 08<br />

‘legacies’) starting as early as 2006. As a result, scores<br />

of articles and discussion papers were produced<br />

in assessing various aspects of post-IPY legacy, IPY<br />

science synthesis and integration (Arctic Council,<br />

2008; Baeseman, 2008; Dickson, 2009; Goodison, 2008;<br />

Hik, 2007; Hik and Church, 2007; Hik and Kraft Sloan,<br />

2007; Kraft Sloan, 2006; Krupnik, 2009; LeDrew et al.,<br />

2008; Sarukhanian, 2008; Kraft Sloan and Hik, 2008;<br />

Summerhayes, 2007; 2008 Summerhayes and Rachold,<br />

2007). The most recent assessment of the prospective<br />

IPY legacies was produced in July 2010 following the<br />

joint AC-ATCM workshop conducted during the Oslo<br />

IPY Science Conference (Winther and Njåstad 2010).<br />

In addition, the 2008 OECD Global Science Forum<br />

released an earlier report assessing IPY <strong>2007–2008</strong><br />

in the context of international scientific cooperation<br />

and the specific need to consider IPY termination and<br />

legacy issues (Stirling, 2007). 2<br />

Nonetheless, a special memorandum developed<br />

by the HAIS group (Heads of Arctic/Antarctic IPY<br />

Secretariats) as early as February 2007 argued that “the<br />

IPY JC should take a leadership role in the efforts to<br />

discuss and secure the IPY legacies” (Rogne; 2007;<br />

emphasis ours – IK). That message resonated with the<br />

emerging vision that the JC role in IPY should expand<br />

to include the evaluation of the key IPY achievements<br />

and the stewardship of the IPY legacy. In fulfilling these<br />

responsibilities, the JC dedicated substantial effort to<br />

formulate its vision on the legacies on IPY <strong>2007–2008</strong><br />

in its two major publications, Scope of Science for the<br />

<strong>International</strong> <strong>Polar</strong> <strong>Year</strong> <strong>2007–2008</strong> (Allison et al., 2007)<br />

and State of <strong>Polar</strong> Research (Allison et al., 2009). A large<br />

section of the latter document was dedicated to the<br />

examination of possible future IPY legacies. It stated<br />

that “[the] rapid pace of scientific advance and our<br />

increasing awareness of humankind’s impact on the<br />

Earth system as a whole suggest that research and<br />

data from IPY <strong>2007–2008</strong> will leave a lasting legacy<br />

in many fields of science, particularly in providing a<br />

clearer picture of what future changes may occur and<br />

what effects they may have” (Allison et al., 2009). Other<br />

major legacies of IPY <strong>2007–2008</strong> (besides its major<br />

science achievements) were identified as follows:<br />

• Observational systems, facilities and infrastructure<br />

• Scientific and political cooperation<br />

• Cross-disciplinary collaboration, synthesis and<br />

integration<br />

• Reference data<br />

• A new generation of polar scientists and engineers<br />

• Broad public interest and participation<br />

• Engagement of Arctic residents, including<br />

indigenous peoples.<br />

Some of those legacies of IPY <strong>2007–2008</strong> outlined<br />

by the JC have already been covered in earlier chapters<br />

of the volume, such as IPY observational initiatives<br />

and reference data (Part 3), new generation of polar<br />

scientists (Chapter 4.3), and the engagement of the<br />

general public (Chapter 4.1). This concluding section<br />

explores other key IPY legacies in greater detail,<br />

starting with Chapter 5.1, which overviews major<br />

science outcomes of IPY, particularly the development<br />

of the new integrative vision on polar processes and<br />

their global linkages. Chapter 5.2 dwells on the role of<br />

IPY in broadening the cross-disciplinary and societal<br />

scope of the new generation of polar research.<br />

Chapter 5.3 evaluates the growing role of non-polar<br />

nations, particularly the members of the Asian Forum<br />

for <strong>Polar</strong> Sciences (AFoPS) in polar studies. Chapter 5.4<br />

addresses the role of the new stakeholders in polar<br />

research, such as polar residents and, especially, Arctic<br />

indigenous people, as well as the societal benefits of<br />

sharing data and knowledge with local communities<br />

and new approaches to polar science education.<br />

Chapter 5.5 examines many new partnerships<br />

forged during the IPY <strong>2007–2008</strong> era and, particularly,<br />

the new vision for unified ‘bipolar’ (Arctic-Antarctic)<br />

science planning and collaboration by major polar<br />

bodies, such as IASC, SCAR, Arctic Council, and ATCM,<br />

as well as the two IPY sponsors, ICSU and <strong>WMO</strong>. Lastly,<br />

Chapter 5.6 explores how the momentum created<br />

by IPY <strong>2007–2008</strong> may be expanded beyond the<br />

timeframe on the fourth IPY, from the Oslo Science<br />

Conference in June 2010 toward the planning of the<br />

next (and final) major IPY-related <strong>Polar</strong> Conference in<br />

Montreal (April 2012), and into what may eventually<br />

become ‘The <strong>International</strong> <strong>Polar</strong> Decade.’

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!