01.03.2013 Views

International Polar Year 2007–2008 - WMO

International Polar Year 2007–2008 - WMO

International Polar Year 2007–2008 - WMO

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

172<br />

IPY 20 07–20 08<br />

decrease in the Arctic watermass (Fig. 2.2-10).<br />

Even though the biophysical model predicted<br />

rather modest changes in the climate and plankton<br />

production of the Barents Sea (Ellingsen et al., 2008),<br />

these changes were nevertheless sufficient to produce<br />

responses in capelin abundance, spawning area and<br />

adult distribution.<br />

New insights into temperature effects on the<br />

distribution of capelin of the Barents Sea. The capelin<br />

stock of the Barents Sea has long been recognized<br />

as a principal food fish for cod and, therefore, as a<br />

key component of the ecosystem on the Norwegian<br />

arctic shelf. The importance of temperature as a<br />

control on distribution of capelin has also long been<br />

recognized, in general terms, but the specifics of that<br />

relationship have now been examined in a study by<br />

Randi Ingvaldsen, IMR Bergen. She finds that when the<br />

temperature increases, the capelin spread northwards<br />

and the distribution-area increases. When the capelin<br />

stock is large, the feeding area is normally extended<br />

eastwards. Consequently, the largest distribution<br />

areas occur when the temperature is high and the<br />

stock is large at the same time.<br />

Complementing this study, Huse and Ellingsen<br />

(2008) have modelled the likely consequences<br />

of global warming on capelin distribution and<br />

population dynamics. With input on physics and<br />

plankton from a biophysical ocean model, the entire<br />

life cycle of capelin including spawning of eggs, larval<br />

drift and adult movement is simulated. The model<br />

generates output on capelin migration/distribution<br />

and population dynamics; simulations are performed<br />

using both a present day climate and a future<br />

climate scenario. For the present climate, the spatial<br />

distributions resemble the typical spatial dynamics of<br />

capelin, with the Murman and North Norway coasts as<br />

the main spawning areas. Nevertheless, for the climate<br />

change simulation, the capelin is predicted to shift<br />

spawning eastwards and also utilize new spawning<br />

areas along Novaya Zemlya. There is also a shift in the<br />

adult distribution towards the north eastern part of<br />

the Barents Sea and earlier spawning associated with<br />

the warming. As the authors point out, it remains an<br />

open question whether capelin will take up spawning<br />

at Novaya Zemlya as predicted by the model, but<br />

there is some evidence that such easterly spawning<br />

has taken place in the past (see Gjøsæter, 1998).<br />

The IPY in the NW Barents Sea. The Svalbard<br />

archipelago in the NW Barents Sea is the eastern<br />

gateway for Atlantic Water flowing into the Arctic.<br />

Consequently the oceanography of the region<br />

is characterized by the distinct water masses of<br />

Atlantic or <strong>Polar</strong> origin, contrasting strongly in their<br />

temperature and salinity. The sea ice conditions<br />

around the archipelago reflect these contrasts, with<br />

northern and eastern coasts having seasonal ice<br />

cover while the west coast is relatively ice-free. Such<br />

a range of conditions permits comparative studies of<br />

ecosystem function to be conducted and has enabled<br />

the investigation of the likely impact of warm, ice-free<br />

conditions on arctic ecosystems (Willis et al., 2006) and<br />

of how ecosystems might respond to changes in the<br />

seasonal timing of retreat of the ice-edge.<br />

Two sites in the archipelago have proved ideal for<br />

such studies. Rijpfjorden, a fjord in Nordaustlandet<br />

that faces north to the Arctic Ocean, represents the<br />

<strong>Polar</strong> extreme while Kongsfjorden in NW Spitsbergen<br />

is a site that is dominated by warm Atlantic Water with<br />

water temperatures in excess of 6°C (Cottier et al.,<br />

2007). The ice-covered nature of Rijpfjorden and the<br />

relatively ice-free conditions in Kongsfjorden provide<br />

a natural setting to investigate the role ice plays in<br />

structuring arctic ecosystems. A key observational<br />

capability is the placement of moored instruments<br />

in each fjord, to provide background environmental<br />

data or as a means of studying the shelf processes.<br />

These moorings have been maintained by the Scottish<br />

Association for Marine Science (www.arcticmarine.<br />

org.uk) since 2002, with the logistical assistance of<br />

Norwegian institutes, particularly University Centre in<br />

Svalbard (www.unis.no).<br />

The issue of ecosystem response to changes in sea<br />

ice conditions have been captured in a Norwegian<br />

IPY project called CLEOPATRA (Climate effects on<br />

planktonic food quality and trophic transfer in Arctic<br />

Marginal Ice Zones). CLEOPATRA was conducted in<br />

Rijpfjorden which can be considered as a mesocosm<br />

site representative of Arctic processes. The main<br />

objectives of the IPY CLEOPATRA project were to study:<br />

(1) the timing, quantity and quality of ice algal and<br />

phytoplankton spring bloom;<br />

(2) how variations in light and UV radiation affect<br />

algal food quality; and<br />

(3) the importance of timing and available food

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!