dictionary of sanskrit grammar

^ and which means the anticipation
of another allied by the
express mention of one, in which
sense the Dvandva compound prescribed
by the rule =Ef$ g;g: does not
take place; cf. srg^t: I 9 3 ^
*Fger M. Bh. on P. II.
2.29 Vart. 15.
denotation of objects
put togethar as by the indeclinable
% ; cp. Vak. pad. II. 195. 196.
418
aggregate, totality, collection
of individual members; cf.
Jtfgr: also cf.
M.Bh.
Ahnika 1 Vart. 14 ; cf. also Bg^T^
I Par. Sek. Pari. 108.
specific individual mention or
discussion - the term is used in
connection with the several sections
of the third Kanda or book of Bhartrhari’s
Vakyapadlya.
simultaneous presentation
of. different (grammatical operations;
cf. 3^5iiRdifir
qftw rrJU M tl KaS. on P. VI. 4.22.
presenting themselves simultaneously;
the word is used in
connection with two grammatical
operations which present themselves
simultaneously.
\
aggregate, group or collection;
one of the prominent senses in
which the tad. affixes apt, and
others are prescribed. These affixes
are called . e.g.
H fjf:); similarly
s^cfT,-JiPjTO. q m , w , etc. cf. P.
IV . 2.37 to 51.
a single collection of several
things forming one unit of sense as
the sense of a fig compound, cp.
Vak. pad. HE. 14.599.
^ 3 ^ connected, the word was used by
ancient grammarians in the sense
of ; cf. m R- T. 27.
3 ? Unadi affix mentioned in the
rule fapgqR tgm w s ^ P. V II. 2.7.
e.g. 3T^s;; cf* 'FEW Unadi.
III. 70.
SFC'P,
natha Tarkavacaspati on the
Siddhantakaumudi.
called also. :•
name of a voluminous grammar
work ascribed to king Bhoja in the
eleventh century. The grammer is
based very closely on Panini’s
Astadhyayi, consisting of eight
chapters or books. Although the
affixes, the augments and the sub-
stiutes are much the same, the
order of the Sutras is considerably
changed. By the anxiety of the
author to bring together, the nece-
ssaiy portions of. the Ganapatha,
the Unadipatha and the Paribhasas,
which the author has included in
his eight chapters, the book instead
of being easy to. understand, has
lost the element - of brevity' and
become tedious for reading. Hence
it is that it is not studied widely.
It has an auto-commentary by
Bhoja himself. There is a commentary
called HrdayaharinI by
Dandanatha, Purusakara .by Krsna,
Ratnadarpana by Ramasimhadeva
and a work called Prakriyasindhu-
setu mentioned by Vitthala in his
Prasada. For details see pp. 392,
393 Vyakarana Mahabhasya Vol.
V II. D. E. Society’s edition.
( 1 ) having the same form for
practical purposes such as the form