dictionary of sanskrit grammar

ehaves like the original”
P.I.1.56); the application
of this maxim is called for
purposes of this ^srrwspgpf the elision
(etq) of a phonetic element is
looked upon as a sort of substitute;
cf. swrst'OT ?*nferaicl, Kas. on P.I.
1.58. Grammarians many times
look upon a complete word or a
word-base as a substitute for
another one, although only a letter
or a syllable in the word is changed
into another, as also when a letter
or syllable is added to or dropped
in a word; cf. f^g, T ^ g .- ^ ^ f r i : I
1 3T(%q% q: e arfer: 1 ^
| M.Bh. on I. 1.58; cf. also
S? M.Bh.
on P. 1. 120; cf. also BinTO
35T%i: M.Bh. on I.1.20; (2) indication,
assignment; cf. ♦jRfel "•
sp^scrti, WlHfRlct, sn%:
R. Pr. I. 30-32; cf. also stc^sj: gq^r:
com. on Tai.-Prat. II. 20; cf. also
swt^r aril^R: V. Pr. IV . 131, where
Uvvata remarks
*MV ^ 3t ^ k :
af^Tc-q:! cf. also
A. Pr. II. x.2, where K is prescribed
as a substitute for a case-
affix and e! and ®r^ are cited as
examples where the acute accent is
also prescribed for the substitute K.