Copyright by William Lloyd Bircher 2010 - The Laboratory for ...
Copyright by William Lloyd Bircher 2010 - The Laboratory for ...
Copyright by William Lloyd Bircher 2010 - The Laboratory for ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Chapter 6 Per<strong>for</strong>mance Effects of<br />
Dynamic Power Management<br />
6.1 Direct and Indirect Per<strong>for</strong>mance Impacts<br />
6.1.1 Transition Costs<br />
Due to physical limitations, transitioning between adaptation states may impose some<br />
cost. <strong>The</strong> cost may be in the <strong>for</strong>m of lost per<strong>for</strong>mance or increased energy consumption.<br />
In the case of DVFS, frequency increases require execution to halt while voltage supplies<br />
ramp up to their new values. This delay is typically proportional to the rate of voltage<br />
change (seconds/volt). Frequency decreases typically do not incur this penalty as most<br />
digital circuits will operate correctly at higher than required voltages. Depending on<br />
implementation, frequency changes may incur delays. If the change requires modifying<br />
the frequency of clock generation circuits (phase locked loops), then execution is halted<br />
until the circuit locks on to its new frequency. This delay may be avoided if frequency<br />
reductions are implemented using methods which maintain a constant frequency in the<br />
clock generator. This is the approach used in Quad-Core AMD processor c-state<br />
implementation. Delay may also be introduced to limit current transients. If a large<br />
number of circuits all transition to a new frequency, then excessive current draw may<br />
result. This has a significant effect on reliability. Delays to limit transients are<br />
103