03.08.2013 Views

Copyright by William Lloyd Bircher 2010 - The Laboratory for ...

Copyright by William Lloyd Bircher 2010 - The Laboratory for ...

Copyright by William Lloyd Bircher 2010 - The Laboratory for ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Chapter 6 Per<strong>for</strong>mance Effects of<br />

Dynamic Power Management<br />

6.1 Direct and Indirect Per<strong>for</strong>mance Impacts<br />

6.1.1 Transition Costs<br />

Due to physical limitations, transitioning between adaptation states may impose some<br />

cost. <strong>The</strong> cost may be in the <strong>for</strong>m of lost per<strong>for</strong>mance or increased energy consumption.<br />

In the case of DVFS, frequency increases require execution to halt while voltage supplies<br />

ramp up to their new values. This delay is typically proportional to the rate of voltage<br />

change (seconds/volt). Frequency decreases typically do not incur this penalty as most<br />

digital circuits will operate correctly at higher than required voltages. Depending on<br />

implementation, frequency changes may incur delays. If the change requires modifying<br />

the frequency of clock generation circuits (phase locked loops), then execution is halted<br />

until the circuit locks on to its new frequency. This delay may be avoided if frequency<br />

reductions are implemented using methods which maintain a constant frequency in the<br />

clock generator. This is the approach used in Quad-Core AMD processor c-state<br />

implementation. Delay may also be introduced to limit current transients. If a large<br />

number of circuits all transition to a new frequency, then excessive current draw may<br />

result. This has a significant effect on reliability. Delays to limit transients are<br />

103

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!