27.09.2013 Views

Submitted for award of PhD September 2006. - King's College London

Submitted for award of PhD September 2006. - King's College London

Submitted for award of PhD September 2006. - King's College London

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

show KAI-IV . 351 Furthermore, the ethnic also appears as kapu in Oscan inscriptions<br />

dating from the third century BC. 352 Capua was perhaps originally called Campua,<br />

which might have rapidly changed in Greek and Oscan to Capua. Second, the<br />

Cainpani appear in the accounts <strong>of</strong> the Latin, Samnite and Hannibalic wars, possibly<br />

to denote the army <strong>of</strong> a population larger than that <strong>of</strong> the civic territory <strong>of</strong> the city <strong>of</strong><br />

Capua, perhaps members <strong>of</strong> a military alliance. Third, the name Campania appears in<br />

Greek and Roman writers from the second century BC to denote the geographical<br />

region, including coastal as well as inland cities. 353<br />

Apart from Capua, several other Campanian communities minted coins in the<br />

period between 420 and 380 BC. The following ethnics appear on coins: Cumae,<br />

Neapolis, Hyria, Nola, Fistelia, Allifae and Fenserni. Cumae, Neapolis, Nola, Capua<br />

and Allifae were independent urban-based communities, but the locations <strong>of</strong> Hyria,<br />

Fistelia and the Fenserni are unknown. The vast majority <strong>of</strong> the coins <strong>of</strong> these<br />

communities bear a man-faced bull as reverse type with wide variations <strong>of</strong> themes on<br />

their obverses. Rutter established die-transferences between the coins <strong>of</strong> Capua and<br />

those <strong>of</strong> Cumae and Neapolis, which were two well-known centres <strong>of</strong> minting during<br />

the fifth century BC. 354 Rutter argued that the Samnite occupation <strong>of</strong> Cumae resulted<br />

in the decrease <strong>of</strong> its coin output and later probably the transferral <strong>of</strong> its mint to<br />

Naples around 420 BC, as changes in the Neapolitan iconography <strong>of</strong> that period<br />

suggest. 355 It is there<strong>for</strong>e probable that the coins were minted at Naples <strong>for</strong> Capua.<br />

Rutter also found that the Capuan coinage shared dies with most <strong>of</strong> the coins <strong>of</strong> other<br />

351<br />

Frederiksen (1984) 138; Rutter (2001) nr. 476-8 and 479-510.<br />

352<br />

ST Cp 33,34 and 35. They will be studied in section 3.3.<br />

353 Diod. Sic. 16.90.2 or Livy 8.1.9 just to mention a few.<br />

354 Rutter (1979) 82.<br />

355<br />

Rutter (1979) 96.<br />

103

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!