27.09.2013 Views

Submitted for award of PhD September 2006. - King's College London

Submitted for award of PhD September 2006. - King's College London

Submitted for award of PhD September 2006. - King's College London

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

In chapters three to six, I have suggested that there are indications that in<br />

Campania there were no long-term political federations. The terms Campanus and<br />

Alfaternus were not used to denote members <strong>of</strong> confederations, but inhabitants <strong>of</strong> civic<br />

communities. The magistracies meddix tuticus, aedilis and guaestor were local, civic<br />

<strong>of</strong>ficials rather than federal magistrates. Coinages showing the legends Capua, Nola and<br />

Nuceria Alfaterna were issued <strong>for</strong> the use <strong>of</strong> civic communities and not to serve as<br />

federal currency. I have concluded there<strong>for</strong>e that there is no good evidence <strong>for</strong> the<br />

existence <strong>of</strong> the supposed Campanian hegemony, apart from perhaps Atella, Calatia and<br />

Sabatinum. Cumae was independent from Capua. Nola and Abella were independent<br />

civic communities between the fourth and -first centuries BC. Similarly, Pompeii,<br />

Herculaneum, Stabiae and Surrentum seem to have been separate civic communities. It<br />

is, however, plausible that communities in Campania <strong>for</strong>med religious and perhaps<br />

short-term military alliances, as the cults celebrated by Cumae and Capua at Hamae<br />

suggest.<br />

260

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!