27.09.2013 Views

Submitted for award of PhD September 2006. - King's College London

Submitted for award of PhD September 2006. - King's College London

Submitted for award of PhD September 2006. - King's College London

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

It is difficult to know where exactly the border between the lands <strong>of</strong> Cumae<br />

and Capua lay after the arrival <strong>of</strong> the Samnites. It is likely, as Frederiksen suggested,<br />

that after its foundation Cumae dominated most <strong>of</strong> the Campanian plain between the<br />

rivers Sebethus and Clanius. 515 The foundation <strong>of</strong> Naples in the second half <strong>of</strong> the<br />

fifth century BC and the development <strong>of</strong> Capua must have diminished the extent <strong>of</strong><br />

the Cumaean territory (see maps III and IV). The sanctuary <strong>of</strong> Hamae, three miles<br />

from Cumae may have been positioned on the border with Capua, because the<br />

sanctuary was under their joint control 516 The foundation <strong>of</strong> Literrum in 194 BC<br />

also limited the extent <strong>of</strong> Cumaean territory to the north, where the sand dunes on<br />

which a <strong>for</strong>est <strong>of</strong> scrub trees grew, referred to by Strabo as the silva gallinaria,<br />

certainly belonged to Capua together with the plain <strong>of</strong> Licola. Cumae also controlled<br />

the areas <strong>of</strong> lakes Avernus, Lucrinus and Fusarus, the hilly lands <strong>of</strong> Mount Gaurus<br />

and probably also the Campi Phlegrei, although following the foundation <strong>of</strong><br />

Dicaearchia by refugees from Samos, these lands probably became the object <strong>of</strong><br />

dispute. The port <strong>of</strong> Misenum and the town <strong>of</strong> Baiae were under Cumaean control <strong>for</strong><br />

most <strong>of</strong> the fourth and third centuries BC. 517<br />

It is not unlikely that these towns were<br />

also conquered by the Samnites at the same time as Cumae.<br />

The coastline <strong>of</strong> Cumae has changed considerably since antiquity. The<br />

acropolis was probably surrounded by the sea on three sides. The area had plenty <strong>of</strong><br />

water with extensive lagoons and marshlands to the south and to the north <strong>of</strong> the city,<br />

and was dotted with lakes. Paget has argued that pre-Samnite Cumae had two<br />

sheltered harbours to accommodate at least part <strong>of</strong> its fleet. 518 The port declined after<br />

the Samnite invasion whether as the result <strong>of</strong> natural causes, such as the shifting <strong>of</strong><br />

515<br />

Frederiksen (1984) map H.<br />

516<br />

Livy 23.35. See also charter 3.2.4.<br />

517<br />

Livy 24.13.6 mentions that Hannibal devastated<br />

the lands <strong>of</strong> Cumae as far as the promontory <strong>of</strong><br />

Misenum, which might suggest that the whole peninsula was under Cumaean control.<br />

144

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!