27.09.2013 Views

Submitted for award of PhD September 2006. - King's College London

Submitted for award of PhD September 2006. - King's College London

Submitted for award of PhD September 2006. - King's College London

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

We have twenty-six iüvilas inscriptions altogether, sixteen <strong>of</strong> which are made<br />

<strong>of</strong> terracotta, ten <strong>of</strong> tufa. 427 It is believed that the tufa inscriptions are more recent<br />

than the terracotta ones. Conway, on the basis <strong>of</strong> phonetic and morphological<br />

differences and changes in the <strong>for</strong>ms <strong>of</strong> letters, divided the inscriptions into three<br />

chronological groups. He compared these groups to the <strong>for</strong>ms <strong>of</strong> letters on legends <strong>of</strong><br />

coins minted <strong>for</strong> Capua, Atella and Calatia, apparently between 268 and<br />

211 BC.<br />

Thus Conway argued that the earliest group <strong>of</strong> inscriptions was inscribed well be<strong>for</strong>e<br />

268 BC, probably in the second half <strong>of</strong> the fourth century BC, the second group not<br />

long be<strong>for</strong>e 268, and the most recent group soon after this date, in the second half <strong>of</strong><br />

the third century BC. Buck argued that the earliest inscriptions, the ones which lack<br />

the i and ü, were inscribed at the end <strong>of</strong> the fourth century BC, while most <strong>of</strong> the<br />

inscriptions come from the third century BC428. Heurgon and Franchi de Bellis<br />

accepted Conway's groups, with slight corrections, and although they found it<br />

difficult to date the groups, they made no drastic changes to Conway's absolute<br />

chronology. 429 The inscriptions can be there<strong>for</strong>e divided into the following<br />

chronological groups:<br />

430<br />

1. second part <strong>of</strong> fourth century BC: ST Cp 8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,<br />

17,19.<br />

2. end <strong>of</strong> fourth century, beginning <strong>of</strong> third century BC: ST Cp 18,20,21,22,<br />

23,26,35.<br />

3. Third century: ST Cp 24,25,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34.<br />

427<br />

Terracotta ones: ST Cp 8-25, tufa ones are: ST Cp 27-35.<br />

428<br />

Buck (1904) 247.<br />

429 Heurgon (1942a) 39-46 cites more recent studies, which suggest that the Capua, Atella and Calatia<br />

minted coins probably only after they revolted from Rome, between 216 and 211, which makes it<br />

difficult to date Conway's groups. Heurgon argued that the <strong>for</strong>ms <strong>of</strong> letters <strong>of</strong> the oldest inscriptions<br />

resemble coins minted by Fistelia from the first half <strong>of</strong> the fourth century. On some <strong>of</strong> the terracotta<br />

tiles by the side <strong>of</strong> the text female heads were stamped. Heurgon points out the similarities between<br />

these heads and antefixes from the mid-fourth century BC.<br />

430<br />

Franchi de Bellis (1981) 28.<br />

118

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!