27.09.2013 Views

Submitted for award of PhD September 2006. - King's College London

Submitted for award of PhD September 2006. - King's College London

Submitted for award of PhD September 2006. - King's College London

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Scholars have also tried to establish relations between the touta and the pagi<br />

and vici: Salmon thought that the pagi were administrative sub-units <strong>of</strong> the touta233<br />

The pagi included vici, oppida and castella, which there<strong>for</strong>e did not have political<br />

lives <strong>of</strong> their own. Capogrossi Colognesi rejects Salmon's scheme, arguing that we<br />

have no evidence to confirm relations between the tribal units and the pagi. He<br />

concludes that this and the attribution <strong>of</strong> political life to the pagi are based on a<br />

preconception <strong>of</strong> Schulten, who was influenced by partial knowledge <strong>of</strong> the pagi <strong>of</strong><br />

Genpan tribes234. Capogrossi Colognesi thinks it unlikely that the vici had no<br />

political or administrative importance. He points out that Strabo and Livy say that the<br />

Samnites lived xccµriböv and vicatim, `in villages' and not pagatim, `in pagi'. I<br />

agree with Capogrossi Colognesi that the pagi were introduced in the territory <strong>of</strong><br />

Beneventum and those <strong>of</strong> the Vestini and Paeligni by the Roman state, and that<br />

Salmon's suggestion that the pagi <strong>for</strong>med the political and administrative sub-unit <strong>of</strong><br />

the touta is without basis. If the touta had a sub-unit, we are not aware <strong>of</strong> what it was<br />

called.<br />

In conclusion, after the fourth century BC sporadic epigraphic evidence<br />

suggests that the term touta <strong>of</strong>ten denoted an urban centre and its territory. However<br />

in Samnium, that is the region <strong>of</strong> the Pentri, because <strong>of</strong> the lack <strong>of</strong> direct evidence,<br />

the question <strong>of</strong> whether touta denoted a local urban centre and its territory or a larger<br />

ethnic community or both, must be left open <strong>for</strong> now. I accept the view that rejects<br />

the idea that a touta was <strong>for</strong>med <strong>of</strong> a number <strong>of</strong> pagi. This does not mean that a touta<br />

did not have sub-units, but only that we do not have in<strong>for</strong>mation about them. We are<br />

233 Salmon (1967) 79-80; Cornell (1995) 345 follows Salmon's view: `A group <strong>of</strong> such pagi would<br />

together <strong>for</strong>m a larger tribal unit, <strong>for</strong> which the Oscan term was touto (Latin populus)'.<br />

234 For criticism <strong>of</strong> Salmon's concept <strong>of</strong> the pagi see Capogrossi Colognesi (2002) 171-5.<br />

70

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!