27.09.2013 Views

Submitted for award of PhD September 2006. - King's College London

Submitted for award of PhD September 2006. - King's College London

Submitted for award of PhD September 2006. - King's College London

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Pompeianus and guaestor Pompeianus. 708 Beloch's view that the meddix tuticus was a<br />

federal magistrate has since been criticised by many scholars. The aim <strong>of</strong> this section is<br />

to re-evaluate the evidence <strong>for</strong> the public <strong>of</strong>fices attested at Pompeii in inscriptions, and<br />

to investigate whether any <strong>of</strong> them could have had more than a local competence.<br />

One <strong>of</strong> the basic problems <strong>of</strong> dealing with the Oscan inscriptions <strong>of</strong> Pompeii is that<br />

most <strong>of</strong> them have been removed from their original context. Sometimes this happened<br />

in antiquity following the foundation <strong>of</strong> the Sullan colony when some stones with Oscan<br />

inscriptions on them were reused as building material. Inscriptions found in private<br />

houses are particularly good examples <strong>of</strong> this, which can be seen as an attempt by a<br />

member <strong>of</strong> a family to preserve the inscriptions set up by an ancestor or as antiquarian<br />

curiosity. In modern times, the majority <strong>of</strong> Oscan inscriptions found during the<br />

eighteenth century were taken to the Archaeological Museum <strong>of</strong> Naples without their<br />

place <strong>of</strong> origin being satisfactorily recorded. Once the town was excavated, many<br />

painted inscriptions faded from the walls due to contact with daylight and weathering.<br />

There are several inscriptions that Zvetaieff and Mommsen could read but which had<br />

already disappeared by the time Conway undertook his work.<br />

Because <strong>of</strong> the lack <strong>of</strong> historical and certain archaeological contexts it is difficult<br />

to date the Pompeian inscriptions. Campania came under Samnite rule in the second half<br />

<strong>of</strong> the fifth century BC. It seems reasonable to suppose that around that time Oscan-<br />

speaking inhabitants also settled in the southern parts <strong>of</strong> the Bay <strong>of</strong> Naples. As we have<br />

seen, Livy refers to Pompeii <strong>for</strong> the first time in 310 BC. It is plausible that by this<br />

period the political structure <strong>of</strong> the settlement was Samnite, although there is no literary<br />

evidence. After 89 BC the <strong>of</strong>ficial language became Latin. In 80 BC, the Samnite<br />

administration was abolished with the foundation <strong>of</strong> the Colonia Cornelia Veneria<br />

708<br />

Beloch (1877) 295.<br />

204

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!