05.10.2013 Views

CONTRADICTION, CRITIQUE, AND DIALECTIC IN ADORNO A ...

CONTRADICTION, CRITIQUE, AND DIALECTIC IN ADORNO A ...

CONTRADICTION, CRITIQUE, AND DIALECTIC IN ADORNO A ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Civil Society<br />

Let us now turn to an analysis of the second institutional sphere of the modern<br />

social order: civil society. First we need briefly to review Hegel’s conception of civil<br />

society and its role in the social order. For Hegel, the sphere of civil society provides<br />

individuals with an institutional space in which they meet each other as abstract equals or<br />

universal “persons” 121 with egoistic private interests that they pursue as sellers or buyers,<br />

and with legitimate claims to protection from the interference of others in their own<br />

private sphere. 122 There are two important points to note about Hegel’s conception of<br />

civil society: First, the sphere as a whole is characterized by relations of exchange<br />

among agents in the “free market,” in which relations individuals meet each other as<br />

equals. Second, in encountering each other as “abstract” and “equal” persons, individuals<br />

develop a sense of universal equality and entitlements to negative “rights” that must be<br />

protected by the state. Thus the primary social good that comes from the sphere of civil<br />

society is that, on its basis, the ideas of equality and universal rights are developed.<br />

Adorno’s criticism of civil society can be formulated in the claim that, because<br />

civil society is subservient to the principle of exchange, it actually undermines both the<br />

ideal of equality and the ideal of dignity that undergirds the concept of human rights.<br />

Adorno’s analysis thus results in a negation of the two points above. Against the first<br />

point, Adorno accepts Marx’s demonstration of the lack of equality characteristic of<br />

121 For Hegel, the term “person” denotes the universality of the self as an abstract bearer of<br />

negative rights. This is basically the liberal conception of the person.<br />

122 The private sphere over which the individual is sovereign involves her “property” (Grundlinien<br />

der Philosophie des Rechts, §44-46), which in turn includes her body (§47), her individual life (§48), and<br />

her material possessions (§49).<br />

115

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!