05.10.2013 Views

CONTRADICTION, CRITIQUE, AND DIALECTIC IN ADORNO A ...

CONTRADICTION, CRITIQUE, AND DIALECTIC IN ADORNO A ...

CONTRADICTION, CRITIQUE, AND DIALECTIC IN ADORNO A ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Threatening, wild nature is pushed ‘outside’ until, in the final stage, it is basically<br />

annulled through the powers of reason (at least insofar as reason’s self-understanding is<br />

concerned).<br />

Der Furcht wähnt er ledig zu sein, wenn es nichts Unbekanntes mehr gibt. Das<br />

bestimmt die Bahn der Entmythologisierung, der Aufklärung, die das Lebendige<br />

mit dem Unlebendigen ineinssetzt wie der Mythos das Unlebendige mit dem<br />

Lebendigen. Aufklärung ist die radikal gewordene, mythische Angst. Die reine<br />

Immanenz des Positivismus, ihr letztes Produkt, ist nichts anderes als ein<br />

gleichsam universales Tabu. Es darf überhaupt nichts mehr draußen sein, weil die<br />

bloße Vorstellung des Draußen die eigentliche Quelle der Angst ist. 233<br />

The development of enlightenment civilization and enlightenment thought thus<br />

follows definite stages, beginning with primary mimesis, then going through animism,<br />

mythology, and finally resulting in the full-fledged subject-object relation of distance and<br />

manipulation that characterizes the apex of enlightenment.<br />

5.4.2 Fixation<br />

It seems clear from the account in Dialektik der Aufklärung that the promise of<br />

infinite pleasure that was only possible through loss of the self in nature (that is, in<br />

primary mimesis) constitutes a desire that human beings never completely superseded, an<br />

infantile wish whose pull on the self—a pull for disintegration into nature—was never<br />

233 Adorno and Horkheimer, Dialektik der Aufklärung, in Max Horkheimer: Gesammelte<br />

Schriften, Vol. 5 (Frankfurt am Main: Fischer Taschenbuch Verlag, 1997), 38. English translation by<br />

Edmund Jephcott in Dialectic of Enlightenment (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2002), 11:<br />

Humans believe themselves free of fear when there is no longer anything unknown. This has<br />

determined the path of demythologization, of enlightenment, which equates the living with the<br />

nonliving as myth had equated the nonliving with the living. Enlightenment is mythical fear<br />

radicalized. The pure immanence of positivism, its ultimate product, is nothing other than a form<br />

of universal taboo. Nothing is allowed to remain outside, since the mere idea of the ‘outside’ is<br />

the real source of fear.<br />

243

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!