05.10.2013 Views

CONTRADICTION, CRITIQUE, AND DIALECTIC IN ADORNO A ...

CONTRADICTION, CRITIQUE, AND DIALECTIC IN ADORNO A ...

CONTRADICTION, CRITIQUE, AND DIALECTIC IN ADORNO A ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

dialectics. The importance of the question of what makes social theory distinctively<br />

critical makes careful investigation of the viability of Adorno’s answer an important<br />

endeavor. Whether negative dialectics ultimately withstands rigorous philosophical<br />

scrutiny or not, understanding its successes and failures cannot fail to be illuminating for<br />

our own ongoing questioning of the grounds of possibility for critique.<br />

Second, although understanding negative dialectics is a necessary condition on<br />

understanding Adorno’s thought, in-depth philosophical study of the logical-ontological<br />

structure of negative dialectics has yet to be pursued in the Anglo-American literature on<br />

Adorno. The reception of Adorno’s philosophy in the United States and England was<br />

initially dominated by Jürgen Habermas’s critique, reiterated by Seyla Benhabib in her<br />

influential Critique, Norm, and Utopia (1986). 2 This critique quickly dismissed the<br />

project of negative dialectics as inherently aporetic under a self-referential paradox:<br />

Habermas and Benhabib argue that Adorno and Horkheimer’s critique of enlightenment<br />

in Dialektik der Aufklärung extends ideology critique to cover the very activity of<br />

critique, and in so doing brings under suspicion the critical capacity of thought in toto—<br />

that is, reason and all its tools. Since they interpret Adorno’s critique of rationality as<br />

‘totalizing,’ and thus applying equally to any and all forms of rationality, they argue that<br />

the critique must also apply to negative dialectics, and thus deny the validity of this form<br />

of thinking. However, neither Habermas nor Benhabib engage in the project of studying<br />

the logical-ontological underpinnings of negative dialectics, which is what I attempt to do<br />

2 See Habermas, Jürgen, “The Entwinement of Myth and Enlightenment: Max Horkheimer and<br />

Theodor Adorno,” in The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity (Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1990),<br />

106-130, and Benhabib, Seyla, Critique, Norm, and Utopia: A Study of the Foundations of Critical Theory<br />

(New York: Columbia University Press, 1986), esp. chapters 5-6, pp. 147-223.<br />

2

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!