05.10.2013 Views

CONTRADICTION, CRITIQUE, AND DIALECTIC IN ADORNO A ...

CONTRADICTION, CRITIQUE, AND DIALECTIC IN ADORNO A ...

CONTRADICTION, CRITIQUE, AND DIALECTIC IN ADORNO A ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The first stage of distance that Adorno and Horhkheimer discuss is the stage of<br />

animism. During this stage, human beings tried to control and appease nature through the<br />

magic ritual: “Der Zauberer macht sich Dämonen ähnlich; um sie zu erschrecken oder zu<br />

besänftigen, gebärdet er sich schreckhaft oder sanft.” 227 Sacrifice was an additional<br />

method of control, used to persuade gods, demons, or natural spirits in order cunningly to<br />

get them to act as one wished and to steer nature in the direction one desired. There was<br />

already in this stage a certain distance between subject and object—a distance not present<br />

in primary mimesis—for the magic ritual worked through representation. Something<br />

done to a symbol was expected to cause the action to befall the object or person<br />

symbolized: for instance, using the hairs of a person and doing something to them would<br />

signify what one wanted to happen to the person herself. Sacrifice worked through<br />

symbolic representation also, as the thing sacrificed constituted a symbol for something<br />

else that the god or spirit coveted.<br />

Symbolic representation, because it involves a differentiation between the symbol<br />

and the symbolized, already establishes some distance between subject and object. But<br />

the distance is bridged by the fact that the symbol necessarily refers to a particular<br />

object, and this attachment to the object is not arbitrary but rather guaranteed by the<br />

specific qualities of the symbol, on the one hand, and the symbolized, on the other. The<br />

symbol is conceived as attached to a particular meaning or sense by virtue of its concrete<br />

qualities, thus necessarily and not accidentally or arbitrarily. In turn, the thing<br />

227 Adorno and Horkheimer, Dialektik der Aufklärung, in Max Horkheimer: Gesammelte<br />

Schriften, Vol. 5 (Frankfurt am Main: Fischer Taschenbuch Verlag, 1997), 32. English translation by<br />

Edmund Jephcott in Dialectic of Enlightenment (Stanford: Stanford University Press, 2002), 6: “The<br />

magician imitates demons; to frighten or placate them he makes intimidating or appeasing gestures.”<br />

237

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!