05.10.2013 Views

CONTRADICTION, CRITIQUE, AND DIALECTIC IN ADORNO A ...

CONTRADICTION, CRITIQUE, AND DIALECTIC IN ADORNO A ...

CONTRADICTION, CRITIQUE, AND DIALECTIC IN ADORNO A ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

current state of things demands a re-examination of the history of enlightenment<br />

civilization.<br />

As we have seen in chapter 5, Adorno and Horkheimer argue that enlightenment<br />

always contained the possibility of, and tendencies toward, its own regression into<br />

barbarism. These tendencies became more and more radicalized with the advancement of<br />

enlightenment as an ever-growing domination of nature. Horkheimer and Adorno<br />

interpret the advancement of enlightenment as a descent into pathology through various<br />

stages beginning with the breakdown of primary mimesis in animism, proceeding through<br />

a gradual distancing from nature in mythology, and culminating with the sharp paranoid<br />

separation of mind from nature that in their view characterizes the present. The question<br />

of how enlightenment descended into “the new barbarism” is thus answered by the<br />

authors of Dialektik der Aufklärung through an interpretation of Western civilization in<br />

terms of a pathological development culminating in paranoia.<br />

Adorno and Horkheimer’s answer to the problem of why enlightenment failed and<br />

became pathological has often and rightly been interpreted as marking a turn in the<br />

tradition of critical theory from the view that the social ills of modern society are<br />

grounded in the structure of capitalism alone to the view that the wider context of<br />

society’s relation to nature must be taken into account too. However, this change has<br />

often been misinterpreted as replacing the critique of capitalism with a one-sided account<br />

of a single root-problem to be found in the dialectic of civilization and nature. Rolf<br />

Wiggerhaus, for instance, says that the project of the dialectic of enlightenment assumed<br />

that it was possible to show that the contemporary cultural crisis was a crisis of<br />

the fundamental principle of all human culture up till then, and that this<br />

fundamental principle was sovereignty over nature. The thesis lying behind this<br />

was that the decisive event in the history of human culture was not the<br />

266

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!