05.10.2013 Views

CONTRADICTION, CRITIQUE, AND DIALECTIC IN ADORNO A ...

CONTRADICTION, CRITIQUE, AND DIALECTIC IN ADORNO A ...

CONTRADICTION, CRITIQUE, AND DIALECTIC IN ADORNO A ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

was already familiar to her but implicit becomes comprehended. As Michael Rosen<br />

notes,<br />

We have to have already implicitly acquired the Scientific consciousness which<br />

the Phenomenology is out to deduce. But we are not yet fully aware that we have<br />

acquired it. It is not a matter of comprehension [Begreifen] or Thought [Denken];<br />

we merely have a figurative representation [Vorstellung] of it. The task of the<br />

Phenomenology is to bring this unconscious knowledge to full knowledge, to<br />

raise consciousness to the level of the activity of the ‘universal self’, to enable us<br />

to move from Science in the form of Vorstellung to Science proper, Absolute<br />

Knowledge or (simply) Thought. But it is itself Science in the form of<br />

Vorstellung. What allows it to presuppose this is a fact of history, namely, that<br />

the formative process of Spirit is completed. 21<br />

Geist has already completed its development. But this cannot be demonstrated to the<br />

skeptic before she follows the journey through the various forms of consciousness that<br />

make up the history of Geist. It can only be shown through the experience of going<br />

through the journey, since only if we do have the knowledge already implicitly will we be<br />

able practically to follow the path of the Phenomenology, and, specifically, to move from<br />

one form of consciousness to the next through determinate negation with a clear<br />

understanding that the movement is dictated by the form of consciousness itself and<br />

therefore ontologically necessitated by it. “Rather than giving a rational, discursive<br />

demonstration in which we try to establish in advance that such reasoning patterns are<br />

plausible, for the benefit of skeptics, the intelligibility of the Phenomenology will give<br />

their justification, as it were, in use.” 22 The intelligibility of the ontological necessity<br />

connecting different forms of consciousness and the ability of the observing<br />

1982), 44.<br />

21 Rosen, Michael, Hegel’s Dialectic and its Criticism (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,<br />

22 Ibid., 44.<br />

20

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!