05.10.2013 Views

CONTRADICTION, CRITIQUE, AND DIALECTIC IN ADORNO A ...

CONTRADICTION, CRITIQUE, AND DIALECTIC IN ADORNO A ...

CONTRADICTION, CRITIQUE, AND DIALECTIC IN ADORNO A ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

consciousness is ultimately able to supersede its opposition to the object and thus to raise<br />

itself to absolute knowledge, for Adorno the subject is never fully able to supersede this<br />

opposition. Specifically, the individual is not able to reconcile itself with the world,<br />

because the concrete, living individual contains a non-conceptual natural component that<br />

exists in ineluctable opposition to the world, and whose suffering relation to the world<br />

enters into conscious reflection and denies the rational reconstruction that would see the<br />

world, and world history, as reconciled with the subject.<br />

Adorno’s point is not just that there is a natural component of the self that is not<br />

fully conceptual or conceptualizable; after all, Hegel accepts this, for he holds that nature,<br />

both inner and outer, always externalizes the Concept only to a limited extent and is<br />

never fully rid of contingency. But for Hegel the human spirit (i.e., consciousness or<br />

mind) is the first full actualization of the Concept, even if it is always embodied and thus<br />

contains a natural moment that is finite. Hegel holds that human consciousness is unique<br />

in the animal realm in that it is able fully to actualize and even to comprehend the full<br />

rational structure of reality as the self-actualization of the Concept, of Reason; and since<br />

spirit itself is a self-conscious externalization of the Concept, it can understand reality as<br />

expressive of its own self, and so as fully reconciled to it.<br />

For Adorno, on the other hand, the inner nature of the human being exists in<br />

irreconcilable opposition with the human spirit or mind, which means that the mind can<br />

never retrieve its natural element to see it as essentially determined by the categories of<br />

reason. In chapter 5, I explain the opposition at issue in detail, showing that Adorno<br />

holds it to be specifically defined by a relation of repression. For now, however, it is<br />

sufficient to note that Adorno holds this opposition to be such that the human being is<br />

34

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!