05.10.2013 Views

CONTRADICTION, CRITIQUE, AND DIALECTIC IN ADORNO A ...

CONTRADICTION, CRITIQUE, AND DIALECTIC IN ADORNO A ...

CONTRADICTION, CRITIQUE, AND DIALECTIC IN ADORNO A ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

accordance with which social reality comes to be ordered does not actually manage to<br />

dominate nature; rather, it results in the recurrent and ever more threatening external<br />

“return” of repressed nature. Human civilization becomes trapped in self-defeating<br />

cycles of violent outbursts aimed at expunging nature and its representatives, in<br />

conditions where the destruction of nature is actually doomed to fail because the<br />

system—i.e., the social order structured as paranoid symptom—is formed precisely so<br />

that threatening nature returns “from without.” And, moreover, the whole social system<br />

is created as a projective denial of repressed nature; it is an inverse image, a negation, of<br />

the repressed wish for nature, and this means that, in fact, the logic by which the social<br />

system is ordered is in a sense determined by the very nature the destruction of which is<br />

the system’s raison d’être. Finally, the instinctual energy that motivates and drives the<br />

self-defeating irrational attempts to destroy nature itself originates in repressed nature.<br />

The “barbaric” social order of paranoid civilization does not actually succeed in<br />

dominating nature but is rather itself dominated by the nature it is obsessed to repress.<br />

The historical events that Adorno and Horkheimer interpret as the conflict leading<br />

to pathology (the stage of intolerable frustration) and the onset of illness proper<br />

(regression and the return of nature) actually run against the actualization of humanity’s<br />

domination of nature. As efficient causes, they bring about the opposite effect: the blind<br />

and unconscious determination of the social order by nature through the pathological<br />

negation of nature in projection. This means that the historical periods that correspond to<br />

the onset and progression of pathology cannot be understood as teleological components<br />

of an overarching history of civilization whose basic tendency is the expansion and<br />

entrenchment of the domination of nature, and the fact that Adorno and Horkheimer find<br />

281

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!