05.10.2013 Views

CONTRADICTION, CRITIQUE, AND DIALECTIC IN ADORNO A ...

CONTRADICTION, CRITIQUE, AND DIALECTIC IN ADORNO A ...

CONTRADICTION, CRITIQUE, AND DIALECTIC IN ADORNO A ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Since the contradiction between appearance and essence (or between limited<br />

empirical studies of social facts and the theoretical concept of the social totality as the<br />

determining ground for those facts) is irrevocable, for it is the constitutive ground of<br />

social reality, the contradiction cannot be conjured away but must rather be understood.<br />

And the kind of understanding that it calls for is insight into its structure as ideological<br />

illusion that originates in reification—that is, the form of understanding that not only<br />

exposes the contradictory relation between essence and appearance, but moreover<br />

sublates [aufhebt] it into a tension internal to a more refined conception of appearance.<br />

The method of critical reflection thus consists, first, in confronting the surface facts of<br />

society with the theoretical conditions of their existence and intelligibility (that is, with<br />

the category of society as a tightly structured totality present in all limited elements of<br />

social life), then showing the discrepancy between the surface facts and the overarching<br />

theoretical structure, and finally analyzing the discrepancy in terms of ideological illusion<br />

grounded in reification.<br />

We have thus found the theoretical ground for the structure of negative dialectics<br />

as it was discovered and described in chapter 2. There I argued that negative dialectical<br />

analyses have a two-step structure:<br />

“Sociology and Empirical Research,” in The Positivist Dispute in German Sociology (Brookfield, Hong<br />

Kong, Singapore, Sydney: Avebury, 1994), 70:<br />

The empirical and the theoretical cannot be registered on a continuum. Compared with the<br />

presumption of insight into the essence of modern society, empirical contributions are like drops<br />

in the ocean. But according to the empirical rules of the game, empirical proofs for the central<br />

structural laws remain, in any case, contestable. It is not a matter of smoothing out such<br />

divergences and harmonizing them. Only a harmonistic view of society could induce one to such<br />

an attempt. Instead, the tensions must be brought to a head in a fruitful manner.<br />

197

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!