12.03.2014 Views

The Effects of Sanction Intensity on Criminal Conduct - JDAI Helpdesk

The Effects of Sanction Intensity on Criminal Conduct - JDAI Helpdesk

The Effects of Sanction Intensity on Criminal Conduct - JDAI Helpdesk

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CHAPTER 3. Risk Predicti<strong>on</strong> for Effective Offender Management:<br />

Patterns <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Offending Severity am<strong>on</strong>g Probati<strong>on</strong>ers.<br />

Introducti<strong>on</strong><br />

Probati<strong>on</strong> in the early twentieth century was generally used as a dispositi<strong>on</strong> for<br />

first-time or minor <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>fenders, while fel<strong>on</strong>s and recidivists tended to receive parole after<br />

incarcerati<strong>on</strong>. By mid-century, the use <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> probati<strong>on</strong> expanded as interest in rehabilitati<strong>on</strong><br />

and community correcti<strong>on</strong>s increased (Clear & Braga, 1995). <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> backlash against<br />

community sentences and the pervasive retributive attitude to punishment since the 1970s<br />

has c<strong>on</strong>tinued to pressurize probati<strong>on</strong> agencies, as many struggle to deal with supervising<br />

parolees <strong>on</strong> their release from pris<strong>on</strong> al<strong>on</strong>gside <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>fenders <strong>on</strong> more intensive probati<strong>on</strong><br />

programs. Furthermore, probati<strong>on</strong> is now frequently used in additi<strong>on</strong> to, rather than in<br />

place <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>, a jail or pris<strong>on</strong> sentence (Ruth & Reitz, 2003). <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> complementary use <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

probati<strong>on</strong> and pris<strong>on</strong> may increase the number <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> serious <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>fenders who come under the<br />

supervisi<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> probati<strong>on</strong> agencies, placing a strain <strong>on</strong> their limited resources. Figures<br />

from Philadelphia’s Adult Probati<strong>on</strong> and Parole Department (APPD) indicate the extent<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the problem: in 2006, over 22 per cent <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> murder arrestees and 16 per cent <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> homicide<br />

victims in the city were under community supervisi<strong>on</strong> (Berk et al., 2009, p. 192).<br />

Sherman (2007, p. 843) has argued that in the absence <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> short-term soluti<strong>on</strong>s to<br />

funding problems, probati<strong>on</strong> agencies should focus their efforts <strong>on</strong> these most serious<br />

cases, “perform[ing] triage <strong>on</strong> their caseload to c<strong>on</strong>centrate scarce resources <strong>on</strong> homicide<br />

preventi<strong>on</strong>” at the expense <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> closely supervising <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>fenders who pose little threat <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> harm<br />

130

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!