The Effects of Sanction Intensity on Criminal Conduct - JDAI Helpdesk
The Effects of Sanction Intensity on Criminal Conduct - JDAI Helpdesk
The Effects of Sanction Intensity on Criminal Conduct - JDAI Helpdesk
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
CHAPTER 3. Risk Predicti<strong>on</strong> for Effective Offender Management:<br />
Patterns <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Offending Severity am<strong>on</strong>g Probati<strong>on</strong>ers.<br />
Introducti<strong>on</strong><br />
Probati<strong>on</strong> in the early twentieth century was generally used as a dispositi<strong>on</strong> for<br />
first-time or minor <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>fenders, while fel<strong>on</strong>s and recidivists tended to receive parole after<br />
incarcerati<strong>on</strong>. By mid-century, the use <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> probati<strong>on</strong> expanded as interest in rehabilitati<strong>on</strong><br />
and community correcti<strong>on</strong>s increased (Clear & Braga, 1995). <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> backlash against<br />
community sentences and the pervasive retributive attitude to punishment since the 1970s<br />
has c<strong>on</strong>tinued to pressurize probati<strong>on</strong> agencies, as many struggle to deal with supervising<br />
parolees <strong>on</strong> their release from pris<strong>on</strong> al<strong>on</strong>gside <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>fenders <strong>on</strong> more intensive probati<strong>on</strong><br />
programs. Furthermore, probati<strong>on</strong> is now frequently used in additi<strong>on</strong> to, rather than in<br />
place <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>, a jail or pris<strong>on</strong> sentence (Ruth & Reitz, 2003). <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> complementary use <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
probati<strong>on</strong> and pris<strong>on</strong> may increase the number <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> serious <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>fenders who come under the<br />
supervisi<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> probati<strong>on</strong> agencies, placing a strain <strong>on</strong> their limited resources. Figures<br />
from Philadelphia’s Adult Probati<strong>on</strong> and Parole Department (APPD) indicate the extent<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the problem: in 2006, over 22 per cent <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> murder arrestees and 16 per cent <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> homicide<br />
victims in the city were under community supervisi<strong>on</strong> (Berk et al., 2009, p. 192).<br />
Sherman (2007, p. 843) has argued that in the absence <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> short-term soluti<strong>on</strong>s to<br />
funding problems, probati<strong>on</strong> agencies should focus their efforts <strong>on</strong> these most serious<br />
cases, “perform[ing] triage <strong>on</strong> their caseload to c<strong>on</strong>centrate scarce resources <strong>on</strong> homicide<br />
preventi<strong>on</strong>” at the expense <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> closely supervising <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>fenders who pose little threat <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> harm<br />
130