The Effects of Sanction Intensity on Criminal Conduct - JDAI Helpdesk
The Effects of Sanction Intensity on Criminal Conduct - JDAI Helpdesk
The Effects of Sanction Intensity on Criminal Conduct - JDAI Helpdesk
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Excluded Studies<br />
Study Reference<br />
Adams (2001)<br />
Specialized sex <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>fender probati<strong>on</strong> in Cook<br />
County links supervisi<strong>on</strong>, treatment.<br />
IL <strong>Criminal</strong> Justice Informati<strong>on</strong> Auth.<br />
“On Good Authority,” 4(7), March.<br />
Adams & Vetter (1971)<br />
Probati<strong>on</strong> caseload size and recidivism rate.<br />
Brit. J. Criminol., 11, 390-3.<br />
Agopian (1990)<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> impact <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> intensive supervisi<strong>on</strong> probati<strong>on</strong><br />
<strong>on</strong> gang-drug <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>fenders.<br />
<strong>Criminal</strong> Justice Policy Rev., 4, 214-22.<br />
Altschuler & Armstr<strong>on</strong>g (1994)<br />
Intensive aftercare for high-risk juveniles:<br />
policies and procedures. Program summary.<br />
US Department <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Justice, Office <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Juvenile<br />
Justice & Delinquency Preventi<strong>on</strong>.<br />
Austin, Quigley, & Cuvelier (1989)<br />
Evaluating the impact <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Ohio’s community<br />
correcti<strong>on</strong>s programs: public safety and costs.<br />
Nati<strong>on</strong>al Council <strong>on</strong> Crime & Delinquency.<br />
Barnoski (2000)<br />
Intensive parole model for high risk juvenile<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>fenders: interim outcomes for the first<br />
cohort <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> youth.<br />
Washingt<strong>on</strong> State Inst. for Public Policy<br />
Bart<strong>on</strong> & Butts (1990)<br />
Viable opti<strong>on</strong>s: intensive supervisi<strong>on</strong><br />
programs for juvenile delinquents.<br />
Crime & Delinquency, 36, 238-256.<br />
Bart<strong>on</strong> & Butts (1991)<br />
Intensive supervisi<strong>on</strong> alternatives for<br />
adjudicated juveniles.<br />
In Armstr<strong>on</strong>g (ed.): Intensive interventi<strong>on</strong>s<br />
with high-risk youths: promising approaches<br />
in juvenile probati<strong>on</strong> and parole, 317-340.<br />
Bayens, Manske & Smykla (1998)<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> impact <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the ‘new penology’ <strong>on</strong> ISP<br />
<strong>Criminal</strong> Justice Rev., 23, 51-62.<br />
Reas<strong>on</strong> for Exclusi<strong>on</strong><br />
Unmatched c<strong>on</strong>trols.<br />
Unmatched c<strong>on</strong>trols.<br />
Outcomes are <strong>on</strong>ly reported for the<br />
treatment group.<br />
No evaluati<strong>on</strong> data reported.<br />
Unmatched c<strong>on</strong>trols.<br />
Unmatched c<strong>on</strong>trols.<br />
C<strong>on</strong>trol group did not receive regular<br />
probati<strong>on</strong> supervisi<strong>on</strong> (90%<br />
incarcerated).<br />
Unmatched c<strong>on</strong>trols.<br />
No crime outcomes.<br />
209