12.03.2014 Views

The Effects of Sanction Intensity on Criminal Conduct - JDAI Helpdesk

The Effects of Sanction Intensity on Criminal Conduct - JDAI Helpdesk

The Effects of Sanction Intensity on Criminal Conduct - JDAI Helpdesk

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

statistical model that would predict the risk <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> serious re<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>fending 1 so that the whole<br />

APPD populati<strong>on</strong> could be stratified by risk level.<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> risk predicti<strong>on</strong> model<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> statistical model used to forecast the risk <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> serious <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>fending is described in<br />

full in Berk et al. (2009). Random forests methods were applied to a dataset <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> all<br />

probati<strong>on</strong> and parole cases in Philadelphia between 2002 and 2004, c<strong>on</strong>taining <strong>on</strong>ly the<br />

data available to probati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>ficers at intake, 2 to predict the risk <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> being charged with a<br />

new serious crime within two years <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the probati<strong>on</strong> or parole case start date. Random<br />

forests is a statistical learning procedure that forecasts outcomes by aggregating results<br />

from multiple classificati<strong>on</strong> and regressi<strong>on</strong> trees. <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> model was designed to stratify the<br />

populati<strong>on</strong> according to APPD’s operati<strong>on</strong>al needs, with the assumpti<strong>on</strong> that the majority<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the caseload was at low risk <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> serious recidivism and thus appropriate for lowintensity<br />

supervisi<strong>on</strong>. At the agency’s request, 61 per cent <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> cases were to be deemed<br />

low risk, with the remainder either high risk (approximately 10 per cent) or neither low<br />

nor high (approximately 30 per cent) (Fig. 3.1). APPD also deemed the proporti<strong>on</strong>s <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

false positives and false negatives expected in the final model to be operati<strong>on</strong>ally<br />

acceptable. <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> proporti<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> false positives (<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>fenders err<strong>on</strong>eously identified as lowrisk)<br />

was set at 5 per cent, and the proporti<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> false negatives (<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>fenders err<strong>on</strong>eously<br />

identified as high risk) was 20 per cent. A higher false negative rate was accepted given<br />

the lesser public safety c<strong>on</strong>cerns around this type <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> error. <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> initial 2002-2004<br />

probati<strong>on</strong> dataset is described as a “training sample,” which is used to ensure the<br />

138

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!