The Effects of Sanction Intensity on Criminal Conduct - JDAI Helpdesk
The Effects of Sanction Intensity on Criminal Conduct - JDAI Helpdesk
The Effects of Sanction Intensity on Criminal Conduct - JDAI Helpdesk
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Study<br />
C<strong>on</strong>tra<br />
Costa Co<br />
CA 1990<br />
(Petersilia<br />
& Turner,<br />
1990)<br />
Los<br />
Angeles Co<br />
CA 1990<br />
(Petersilia<br />
& Turner,<br />
1990)<br />
Ventura Co<br />
CA 1990<br />
(Petersilia<br />
& Turner,<br />
1990)<br />
Atlanta GA<br />
1992<br />
(Petersilia,<br />
Turner, &<br />
Deschenes,<br />
1992b)<br />
Research<br />
Design<br />
Randomized<br />
c<strong>on</strong>trolled<br />
trial<br />
Randomized<br />
c<strong>on</strong>trolled<br />
trial<br />
Randomized<br />
c<strong>on</strong>trolled<br />
trial<br />
Randomized<br />
c<strong>on</strong>trolled<br />
trial<br />
Populati<strong>on</strong><br />
Adults c<strong>on</strong>victed<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> fel<strong>on</strong>y and<br />
misdemeanor<br />
drug use, drug<br />
dealing, and n<strong>on</strong>violent<br />
drugrelated<br />
crime.<br />
Adults c<strong>on</strong>victed<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> fel<strong>on</strong>ies and<br />
classified as high<br />
risk.<br />
Adults c<strong>on</strong>victed<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> fel<strong>on</strong>ies and<br />
classified as high<br />
risk or c<strong>on</strong>victed<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> serious crime.<br />
Pris<strong>on</strong>ers released<br />
to ISP or<br />
probati<strong>on</strong>ers due<br />
to be revoked and<br />
returned to<br />
pris<strong>on</strong>. Drug<br />
involved, high<br />
risk/need.<br />
Interventi<strong>on</strong><br />
40:1 caseload, 1 face-to-face<br />
c<strong>on</strong>tact/drug test and 2 ph<strong>on</strong>e<br />
calls per week, gradually<br />
reduced. Employment<br />
assistance, counseling, and links<br />
with law enforcement.<br />
33:1 caseload, 3-5 face-to-face<br />
c<strong>on</strong>tacts and 2 ph<strong>on</strong>e calls per<br />
week, gradually reducing.<br />
M<strong>on</strong>itoring checks.<br />
19:1 caseload, 4 face-to-face<br />
c<strong>on</strong>tacts, 2 ph<strong>on</strong>e calls, 1 drug<br />
test per week, plus m<strong>on</strong>itoring<br />
checks, gradually reduced.<br />
Employment assistance, victim<br />
awareness, links with law<br />
enforcement.<br />
Augmented ISP with increased<br />
surveillance (passive<br />
m<strong>on</strong>itoring, <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>ficer checks). 40:3<br />
caseload. Rehabilitati<strong>on</strong>,<br />
employment, drug tests,<br />
m<strong>on</strong>itoring <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> activities. Same<br />
c<strong>on</strong>tact level as c<strong>on</strong>trols.<br />
Comparis<strong>on</strong><br />
150-200:1<br />
caseload,<br />
infrequent,<br />
discreti<strong>on</strong>ary<br />
c<strong>on</strong>tact, random<br />
drug tests,<br />
employment<br />
assistance.<br />
250:1 caseload, 1<br />
face-to-face<br />
c<strong>on</strong>tact per<br />
m<strong>on</strong>th.<br />
Existing ISP.<br />
50:1 caseload, 2<br />
face-to-face visits<br />
and 1 ph<strong>on</strong>e call<br />
per m<strong>on</strong>th, no<br />
victim awareness.<br />
Existing ISP. 12<br />
face-to-face, 10<br />
ph<strong>on</strong>e per m<strong>on</strong>th,<br />
random drug<br />
tests, job<br />
verificati<strong>on</strong><br />
weekly.<br />
Outcome<br />
Treatment group<br />
more likely to<br />
fail <strong>on</strong> technical<br />
violati<strong>on</strong>s and<br />
arrests. No<br />
difference for<br />
c<strong>on</strong>victi<strong>on</strong>s.<br />
Treatment group<br />
more likely to<br />
fail <strong>on</strong> technical<br />
violati<strong>on</strong>s,<br />
arrests, and<br />
c<strong>on</strong>victi<strong>on</strong>s.<br />
Treatment group<br />
less likely to fail<br />
<strong>on</strong> technical<br />
violati<strong>on</strong>s,<br />
arrests, and<br />
c<strong>on</strong>victi<strong>on</strong>s.<br />
Treatment group<br />
more likely to<br />
fail <strong>on</strong> technical<br />
violati<strong>on</strong>s,<br />
arrests, and<br />
c<strong>on</strong>victi<strong>on</strong>s. No<br />
c<strong>on</strong>victi<strong>on</strong>s in<br />
c<strong>on</strong>trol group.<br />
197