The Effects of Sanction Intensity on Criminal Conduct - JDAI Helpdesk
The Effects of Sanction Intensity on Criminal Conduct - JDAI Helpdesk
The Effects of Sanction Intensity on Criminal Conduct - JDAI Helpdesk
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Study Reference<br />
Otoyo (1983)<br />
A study <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the relati<strong>on</strong>ship <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> increased<br />
supervisory c<strong>on</strong>tacts to recidivism.<br />
Ed.D. Diss., Pepperdine Univ.<br />
Petersilia (1989)<br />
Probati<strong>on</strong> and fel<strong>on</strong>y <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>fenders.<br />
Fed. Prob., 49, 4-9.<br />
Petersilia & Turner (1990)<br />
Los Angeles Electr<strong>on</strong>ic Supervisi<strong>on</strong><br />
(other programs, including Los Angeles n<strong>on</strong>-<br />
EM, are eligible).<br />
See reference in Bibliography.<br />
Petersilia & Turner (1990)<br />
Diverting pris<strong>on</strong>ers to intensive probati<strong>on</strong>:<br />
results <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> an experiment in Oreg<strong>on</strong>.<br />
RAND Corp.<br />
Petersilia & Turner (1993)<br />
Evaluating Intensive Supervisi<strong>on</strong><br />
Probati<strong>on</strong>/Parole: results <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> a nati<strong>on</strong>al<br />
experiment.<br />
[Mari<strong>on</strong> Co., OR & Milwaukee, WI <strong>on</strong>ly.<br />
Other studies eligible.]<br />
NIJ Research in Brief<br />
Petersilia, Turner, & Deschenes (1992b)<br />
Mac<strong>on</strong>, GA program (others are eligible)<br />
See reference in Bibliography.<br />
Reichel & Sudbrack (1994)<br />
Differences am<strong>on</strong>g eligibles: who gets an ISP<br />
sentence?<br />
Fed. Prob., 58, 51-58.<br />
Rengifo & Scott-Hayward (2008)<br />
Assessing the effectiveness <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> intermediate<br />
sancti<strong>on</strong>s: Multnomah County, Oreg<strong>on</strong>.<br />
Vera Inst. <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Justice Report Summary.<br />
Rhyne & Hamblin (2008)<br />
What works with the DV <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>fender? Services,<br />
sancti<strong>on</strong>s and supervisi<strong>on</strong>.<br />
Multnomah Co. Dept <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Community Justice,<br />
Portland, OR.<br />
Reas<strong>on</strong> for Exclusi<strong>on</strong><br />
Not a test <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> probati<strong>on</strong> supervisi<strong>on</strong><br />
intensity (looked at type <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>tact<br />
rather than frequency).<br />
No comparis<strong>on</strong> group.<br />
Not a test <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> probati<strong>on</strong> supervisi<strong>on</strong><br />
intensity.<br />
Electr<strong>on</strong>ic m<strong>on</strong>itoring is the <strong>on</strong>ly<br />
difference between treatment and<br />
c<strong>on</strong>trol programs.<br />
Incarcerated c<strong>on</strong>trols.<br />
Electr<strong>on</strong>ic m<strong>on</strong>itoring is the <strong>on</strong>ly<br />
difference between treatment and<br />
c<strong>on</strong>trol programs.<br />
Not a test <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> probati<strong>on</strong> supervisi<strong>on</strong><br />
intensity.<br />
Not a test <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> probati<strong>on</strong> supervisi<strong>on</strong><br />
intensity.<br />
No comparis<strong>on</strong> group.<br />
215