12.03.2014 Views

The Effects of Sanction Intensity on Criminal Conduct - JDAI Helpdesk

The Effects of Sanction Intensity on Criminal Conduct - JDAI Helpdesk

The Effects of Sanction Intensity on Criminal Conduct - JDAI Helpdesk

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

specific informati<strong>on</strong> for drug <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>fenses, which c<strong>on</strong>stitute 16 per cent <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> all the charges in<br />

our sample. Furthermore, the age <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> these studies and changes in prices and m<strong>on</strong>etary<br />

value may limit the usefulness <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> their estimates (although procedures are available for<br />

c<strong>on</strong>verting them into current values).<br />

One proxy for dollar value that would also allow a basic distincti<strong>on</strong> to be drawn<br />

between more or less ‘expensive’ crimes is victim status (crimes with victims, such as<br />

assault, versus ‘victimless’ crimes like drug and weap<strong>on</strong> possessi<strong>on</strong>). This approach<br />

assumes that crimes with victims cost society more because the victims themselves suffer<br />

both tangible (e.g., loss <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> earnings) and n<strong>on</strong>-tangible (e.g. fear) costs, in additi<strong>on</strong> to the<br />

criminal justice system costs <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> processing the <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>fender, while n<strong>on</strong>-victim crimes<br />

(crudely) <strong>on</strong>ly involve <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>fender-related costs. Of course, the reality is less clear-cut, but<br />

victim status remains a useful proxy for cost, and does not fully overlap with substantive<br />

severity. 4 We define ‘victim’ crimes as those <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>fenses that were most likely to have<br />

involved injury or death, psychological distress, loss <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> earnings, or other costs such as<br />

loss <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> or damage to property <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> a pers<strong>on</strong>al (not corporate) victim. <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> process <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

applying the definiti<strong>on</strong> was somewhat crude, because <strong>on</strong>ly limited informati<strong>on</strong> about the<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>fense was available. Our criminal history database c<strong>on</strong>tained a free-text descripti<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

each <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>fense and a statute secti<strong>on</strong> and subsecti<strong>on</strong> reference. 5<br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>fense type was<br />

initially determined by reference to the relevant statute, as we believed that variable<br />

would be more accurate than the free-text descripti<strong>on</strong>. <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> descripti<strong>on</strong> was used for<br />

c<strong>on</strong>firmati<strong>on</strong> and additi<strong>on</strong>al informati<strong>on</strong> about the <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>fense. However, without full crime<br />

reports for each <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>fense, it was not possible to know for certain whether a victim was<br />

149

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!