The Effects of Sanction Intensity on Criminal Conduct - JDAI Helpdesk
The Effects of Sanction Intensity on Criminal Conduct - JDAI Helpdesk
The Effects of Sanction Intensity on Criminal Conduct - JDAI Helpdesk
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
specific informati<strong>on</strong> for drug <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>fenses, which c<strong>on</strong>stitute 16 per cent <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> all the charges in<br />
our sample. Furthermore, the age <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> these studies and changes in prices and m<strong>on</strong>etary<br />
value may limit the usefulness <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> their estimates (although procedures are available for<br />
c<strong>on</strong>verting them into current values).<br />
One proxy for dollar value that would also allow a basic distincti<strong>on</strong> to be drawn<br />
between more or less ‘expensive’ crimes is victim status (crimes with victims, such as<br />
assault, versus ‘victimless’ crimes like drug and weap<strong>on</strong> possessi<strong>on</strong>). This approach<br />
assumes that crimes with victims cost society more because the victims themselves suffer<br />
both tangible (e.g., loss <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> earnings) and n<strong>on</strong>-tangible (e.g. fear) costs, in additi<strong>on</strong> to the<br />
criminal justice system costs <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> processing the <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>fender, while n<strong>on</strong>-victim crimes<br />
(crudely) <strong>on</strong>ly involve <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>fender-related costs. Of course, the reality is less clear-cut, but<br />
victim status remains a useful proxy for cost, and does not fully overlap with substantive<br />
severity. 4 We define ‘victim’ crimes as those <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>fenses that were most likely to have<br />
involved injury or death, psychological distress, loss <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> earnings, or other costs such as<br />
loss <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> or damage to property <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> a pers<strong>on</strong>al (not corporate) victim. <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> process <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
applying the definiti<strong>on</strong> was somewhat crude, because <strong>on</strong>ly limited informati<strong>on</strong> about the<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>fense was available. Our criminal history database c<strong>on</strong>tained a free-text descripti<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
each <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>fense and a statute secti<strong>on</strong> and subsecti<strong>on</strong> reference. 5<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>fense type was<br />
initially determined by reference to the relevant statute, as we believed that variable<br />
would be more accurate than the free-text descripti<strong>on</strong>. <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> descripti<strong>on</strong> was used for<br />
c<strong>on</strong>firmati<strong>on</strong> and additi<strong>on</strong>al informati<strong>on</strong> about the <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>fense. However, without full crime<br />
reports for each <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>fense, it was not possible to know for certain whether a victim was<br />
149