The Effects of Sanction Intensity on Criminal Conduct - JDAI Helpdesk
The Effects of Sanction Intensity on Criminal Conduct - JDAI Helpdesk
The Effects of Sanction Intensity on Criminal Conduct - JDAI Helpdesk
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Study<br />
Los Angeles<br />
CA 2005<br />
(Zhang &<br />
Zhang, 2005)<br />
New Jersey<br />
ISSP 2005<br />
(Paparozzi &<br />
Gendreau,<br />
2005)<br />
Norfolk VA<br />
2005<br />
(Wiebush et<br />
al., 2005)<br />
Maryland<br />
PCS 2006<br />
(Taxman,<br />
Yancey, &<br />
Bilanin,<br />
2006)<br />
Research<br />
Design<br />
Randomized<br />
c<strong>on</strong>trolled<br />
trial with<br />
high<br />
attriti<strong>on</strong>.<br />
Quasiexperiment<br />
(matched<br />
sample<br />
design)<br />
Randomized<br />
c<strong>on</strong>trolled<br />
trial with<br />
high<br />
attriti<strong>on</strong>.<br />
Quasiexperiment<br />
(matched<br />
pairs<br />
design)<br />
Populati<strong>on</strong><br />
Juveniles under<br />
court supervisi<strong>on</strong>,<br />
meeting risk<br />
factors for<br />
delinquency, drug<br />
use and school or<br />
family problems.<br />
Mixed youth and<br />
adult parolee<br />
sample – high<br />
risk/need.<br />
High risk male<br />
juvenile parolees<br />
originally placed<br />
in specific<br />
correcti<strong>on</strong>al<br />
facility.<br />
Mostly<br />
probati<strong>on</strong>ers and<br />
some parolees,<br />
high risk for<br />
recidivism.<br />
Interventi<strong>on</strong><br />
25:1 caseload, increased<br />
frequency <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>tact, str<strong>on</strong>g<br />
focus <strong>on</strong> educati<strong>on</strong> and<br />
ensuring access to social<br />
services.<br />
20-25:1 caseload, treatmentfocused<br />
program. Drug<br />
treatment, employment<br />
assistance, public and<br />
family provide assistance.<br />
15:1 caseload, 10 c<strong>on</strong>tacts<br />
per m<strong>on</strong>th average<br />
gradually decreasing. Drug<br />
treatment, educati<strong>on</strong>, home<br />
visits, reentry services,<br />
treatment linkage.<br />
55:1 caseload, emphasis <strong>on</strong><br />
nature and c<strong>on</strong>tent <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
c<strong>on</strong>tacts. Officer facilitates<br />
behavior management:<br />
treatment and pro-social<br />
activity.<br />
Comparis<strong>on</strong><br />
100-150:1,<br />
regular<br />
probati<strong>on</strong><br />
supervisi<strong>on</strong>.<br />
75-85:1<br />
caseload.<br />
Regular parole<br />
– also received<br />
services but<br />
less so.<br />
Caseload not<br />
specified.<br />
Regular parole,<br />
including<br />
services (less<br />
than treatment<br />
group).<br />
100:1 caseload,<br />
regular<br />
probati<strong>on</strong>/parol<br />
e supervisi<strong>on</strong>.<br />
Outcome<br />
Treatment group<br />
more likely to fail <strong>on</strong><br />
technical violati<strong>on</strong><br />
but less likely <strong>on</strong><br />
arrest after 6 m<strong>on</strong>ths<br />
– eventually no<br />
difference.<br />
Treatment group<br />
more likely to fail <strong>on</strong><br />
technical violati<strong>on</strong><br />
but less likely to be<br />
revoked for new<br />
c<strong>on</strong>victi<strong>on</strong>.<br />
Treatment group less<br />
likely to fail <strong>on</strong><br />
arrests and<br />
c<strong>on</strong>victi<strong>on</strong>s, more<br />
likely <strong>on</strong> technical<br />
violati<strong>on</strong>s.<br />
Treatment group less<br />
likely to fail <strong>on</strong> new<br />
arrests and violati<strong>on</strong><br />
warrants.<br />
206