The Effects of Sanction Intensity on Criminal Conduct - JDAI Helpdesk
The Effects of Sanction Intensity on Criminal Conduct - JDAI Helpdesk
The Effects of Sanction Intensity on Criminal Conduct - JDAI Helpdesk
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
B. ELIGIBILITY CHECKLIST<br />
B1. First author’s last name: elname<br />
B2. Coder initials: coelig<br />
B3. Date eligibility determined: eldate<br />
To be eligible, a study must meet the following criteria. Answer each questi<strong>on</strong> with 1 = Yes,<br />
0 = No.<br />
B4. <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> study evaluates an intensive probati<strong>on</strong> or parole program involving increased supervisi<strong>on</strong><br />
by probati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>ficers in a reduced caseload, or low-intensity probati<strong>on</strong> (increased caseload, less<br />
supervisi<strong>on</strong>). 1. Yes 0. No evpro<br />
B5. A difference in probati<strong>on</strong> intensity between the treatment and comparis<strong>on</strong> groups, as<br />
evidenced by a change in caseload size, ratio <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> clients to <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>ficers, or other c<strong>on</strong>trol measures, is a<br />
key comp<strong>on</strong>ent <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the overall program. 1. Yes 0. No evsep<br />
B6. <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> study includes a comparis<strong>on</strong> group receiving ‘standard probati<strong>on</strong>,’ not comprised <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
dropouts from ISP/low intensity, or other supervisi<strong>on</strong> by probati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>ficer (not incarcerated<br />
c<strong>on</strong>trols). Study design may be experimental or quasi-experimental, but not a <strong>on</strong>e-group research<br />
design. 1. Yes 0. No evcomp<br />
B7. <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> study includes a post-program measure <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> criminal behavior (arrest, c<strong>on</strong>victi<strong>on</strong>) or<br />
technical violati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> probati<strong>on</strong>/parole – may be <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>ficial or self-reported and dichotomous or<br />
c<strong>on</strong>tinuous. 1. Yes 0. No evoutc<br />
For documents that do not meet the above criteria, answer the following questi<strong>on</strong>s:<br />
B8. Document is not a quantitative evaluati<strong>on</strong> (no data regarding effects <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> ISP/LIP reported).<br />
1. Yes 0. No evndat<br />
B9. Document is a review article relevant to this project (e.g., references to studies, background<br />
informati<strong>on</strong> for write-up). 1. Yes 0. No evusef<br />
B10. Document status (circle <strong>on</strong>e): elstat<br />
1. Eligible<br />
0. Not eligible<br />
9. Relevant review<br />
Notes:<br />
184