The Effects of Sanction Intensity on Criminal Conduct - JDAI Helpdesk
The Effects of Sanction Intensity on Criminal Conduct - JDAI Helpdesk
The Effects of Sanction Intensity on Criminal Conduct - JDAI Helpdesk
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
impact <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> probati<strong>on</strong> supervisi<strong>on</strong> itself <strong>on</strong> crime: the number <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> cases a probati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>ficer<br />
handles, the frequency <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> c<strong>on</strong>tact between <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>ficer and client, and the nature <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the<br />
interacti<strong>on</strong>. Supervisi<strong>on</strong> is perhaps c<strong>on</strong>sidered an uninteresting part <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the probati<strong>on</strong><br />
process, “in the background <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> other programming” and therefore “inc<strong>on</strong>sequential to<br />
effectiveness” (Taxman, 2002, p. 179).<br />
On the c<strong>on</strong>trary, supervisi<strong>on</strong> is a crucial aspect <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> probati<strong>on</strong> not <strong>on</strong>ly because it is<br />
the bedrock <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> programming, but also because in a chr<strong>on</strong>ically under-funded enterprise it<br />
may c<strong>on</strong>stitute the <strong>on</strong>ly interacti<strong>on</strong> between client and agency. In this regard it may<br />
directly impact the client’s future criminal behavior.<br />
If a probati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>ficer with a<br />
caseload <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> 150 clients has inadequate time to spend with each <strong>on</strong>e, s/he may find it<br />
impossible to build an accurate picture <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> individuals’ needs in order to target<br />
programming most effectively. Supervisi<strong>on</strong> levels vary widely, from weekly or twiceweekly<br />
meetings for high-risk or delinquent probati<strong>on</strong>ers, to teleph<strong>on</strong>e reporting for those<br />
near the end <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> their sentences. In some busy agencies ‘supervisi<strong>on</strong>’ may c<strong>on</strong>stitute<br />
nothing more than a mail-in c<strong>on</strong>tact detail c<strong>on</strong>firmati<strong>on</strong> card (Petersilia & Turner, 1993,<br />
p. 285). It is not always clear whether supervisi<strong>on</strong> intensity is related to the client’s needs<br />
or risk, or whether it is simply determined by operati<strong>on</strong>al capabilities.<br />
In this paper, we c<strong>on</strong>duct a systematic search for literature <strong>on</strong> probati<strong>on</strong><br />
supervisi<strong>on</strong> intensity and synthesize the results using meta-analytic techniques to present<br />
the most current knowledge about the effect <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> changing intensity <strong>on</strong> probati<strong>on</strong>ers’<br />
subsequent criminal c<strong>on</strong>duct. We find that the amount <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> supervisi<strong>on</strong> in itself does not<br />
appear to be associated with recidivism outcomes. More supervisi<strong>on</strong> may in fact increase<br />
2