The Effects of Sanction Intensity on Criminal Conduct - JDAI Helpdesk
The Effects of Sanction Intensity on Criminal Conduct - JDAI Helpdesk
The Effects of Sanction Intensity on Criminal Conduct - JDAI Helpdesk
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
D14. Race/ethnicity <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> sample (999 if unknown):<br />
% Asian: rasian % Native American: rnative<br />
% Black: rblack % White: rwhite<br />
% Hispanic: rhisp % Other: rother<br />
D15. General <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>fender type: <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>ftype<br />
1. Violent and/or pers<strong>on</strong> crimes 6. Specialized caseload: mental health<br />
2. N<strong>on</strong>violent and/or n<strong>on</strong>pers<strong>on</strong> crimes 7. Specialized: domestic violence<br />
3. Mixed: violent/n<strong>on</strong>violent 8. Other:<br />
4. Specialized caseload: drugs<br />
5. Specialized caseload: sex <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>fenders 9. D<strong>on</strong>’t know/can’t tell<br />
D16. Compositi<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> supervised <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>fenders: <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>fcomp<br />
1. All probati<strong>on</strong>ers<br />
2. All parolees<br />
3. Probati<strong>on</strong>ers and parolees<br />
D16a. If combinati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> probati<strong>on</strong>ers and parolees (999 if unknown):<br />
% probati<strong>on</strong>: pcpro % parole: pcpar<br />
D17. Probati<strong>on</strong>er/parolee risk level: <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>frisk<br />
1. Low risk 6. All risk levels<br />
2. Medium risk 7. No risk assessment<br />
3. High risk 8. Other:<br />
4. Low and medium risks<br />
5. Medium and high risks 9. D<strong>on</strong>’t know/can’t tell<br />
D18. How was risk determined? riskjmt<br />
1. Statistical model 5. Classificati<strong>on</strong> instrument<br />
2. Prior c<strong>on</strong>victi<strong>on</strong>s 7. N/A<br />
3. Instant <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>fense 8. Other:<br />
4. Judgment <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> probati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>ficer/intake 9. D<strong>on</strong>’t know/can’t tell<br />
D19. Probati<strong>on</strong>er/parolee need level: <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>fneed<br />
1. Low need 6. All need levels<br />
2. Medium need 7. No need assessment<br />
3. High need 8. Other:<br />
4. Low and medium need<br />
5. Medium and high need 9. D<strong>on</strong>’t know/can’t tell<br />
189