The Effects of Sanction Intensity on Criminal Conduct - JDAI Helpdesk
The Effects of Sanction Intensity on Criminal Conduct - JDAI Helpdesk
The Effects of Sanction Intensity on Criminal Conduct - JDAI Helpdesk
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Study Reference<br />
Turner & Greene (1999)<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> FARE probati<strong>on</strong> experiment:<br />
implementati<strong>on</strong> and outcomes <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> day fines for<br />
fel<strong>on</strong>y <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>fenders in Maricopa County.<br />
Justice Sys. J., 21, 1-21.<br />
Turner & Jannetta (2007)<br />
Implementati<strong>on</strong> and early outcomes for the<br />
San Diego High Risk Sex Offender (HRSO)<br />
GPS pilot program<br />
Cen. for Evidence-Based Correcti<strong>on</strong>s, UC<br />
Irvine.<br />
Turner, Petersilia, Deschenes (1992)<br />
Evaluating Intensive Supervisi<strong>on</strong><br />
Probati<strong>on</strong>/Parole (ISP) for drug <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>fenders.<br />
Crime & Delinquency, 38, 539-556.<br />
Turner et al. (2002)<br />
Evaluati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the South Oxnard Challenge<br />
Project 1997-2001.<br />
RAND Corporati<strong>on</strong>.<br />
Ulmer & van Asten (2004)<br />
Restrictive Intermediate Punishments and<br />
recidivism in Pennsylvania.<br />
Fed. Sent. Rep., 16, 182-187.<br />
Van Vleet et al. (2002)<br />
Evaluati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Utah’s Early Interventi<strong>on</strong><br />
Mandate: the juvenile sentencing guidelines<br />
and intermediate sancti<strong>on</strong>s.<br />
Nati<strong>on</strong>al Institute <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Justice.<br />
Virginia Department <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Correcti<strong>on</strong>s (1988)<br />
Intensive Supervisi<strong>on</strong> Program (ISP) final<br />
evaluati<strong>on</strong> report: client characteristics and<br />
supervisi<strong>on</strong> outcomes: a caseload comparis<strong>on</strong>.<br />
Vito (1986)<br />
Fel<strong>on</strong>y probati<strong>on</strong> and recidivism: replicati<strong>on</strong><br />
and resp<strong>on</strong>se.<br />
Fed. Prob., 50, 17-25.<br />
Wagner & Baird (1993)<br />
Evaluati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the Florida Community C<strong>on</strong>trol<br />
Program.<br />
Nati<strong>on</strong>al Institute <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Justice.<br />
Reas<strong>on</strong> for Exclusi<strong>on</strong><br />
Not a test <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> probati<strong>on</strong> supervisi<strong>on</strong><br />
intensity (tests fine payment c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong><br />
with no probati<strong>on</strong> supervisi<strong>on</strong>).<br />
Unmatched c<strong>on</strong>trols (subjects who<br />
score highly <strong>on</strong> an instrument are<br />
assigned to treatment).<br />
Insufficient data to calculate effect<br />
sizes.<br />
See also Petersilia & Turner (1993).<br />
Supervisi<strong>on</strong> for the treatment group<br />
not always provided by probati<strong>on</strong><br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>ficers.<br />
Unmatched c<strong>on</strong>trols.<br />
Not a test <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> probati<strong>on</strong> supervisi<strong>on</strong><br />
intensity.<br />
Unmatched incarcerated or probati<strong>on</strong><br />
violator c<strong>on</strong>trols.<br />
Not a test <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> probati<strong>on</strong> supervisi<strong>on</strong><br />
intensity.<br />
Incarcerated c<strong>on</strong>trols.<br />
218