The Effects of Sanction Intensity on Criminal Conduct - JDAI Helpdesk
The Effects of Sanction Intensity on Criminal Conduct - JDAI Helpdesk
The Effects of Sanction Intensity on Criminal Conduct - JDAI Helpdesk
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Study<br />
Minnesota<br />
ISR 1995<br />
(Deschenes,<br />
Turner, &<br />
Petersilia,<br />
1995)<br />
Midwest<br />
1998<br />
(Latessa et<br />
al., 1998)<br />
Northeast<br />
1998<br />
(Latessa et<br />
al., 1998)<br />
CA Drug<br />
Test 2002<br />
(Haapanen<br />
& Britt<strong>on</strong>,<br />
2002)<br />
Research<br />
Design<br />
Randomized<br />
c<strong>on</strong>trolled<br />
trial<br />
Randomized<br />
c<strong>on</strong>trolled<br />
trial<br />
Randomized<br />
c<strong>on</strong>trolled<br />
trial<br />
Randomized<br />
c<strong>on</strong>trolled<br />
trial<br />
Populati<strong>on</strong><br />
Parolees<br />
c<strong>on</strong>sidered a<br />
“public risk<br />
m<strong>on</strong>itoring case”<br />
(high risk).<br />
Rural populati<strong>on</strong>,<br />
mostly white<br />
males (youth and<br />
adult), higher risk<br />
and need levels.<br />
Urban<br />
populati<strong>on</strong>,<br />
mostly males,<br />
youth and adult,<br />
higher risk and<br />
need levels.<br />
Youthful<br />
parolees.<br />
Generally serious<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>fenders with<br />
substance abuse<br />
and other<br />
problems.<br />
Interventi<strong>on</strong><br />
12-15:1 caseload, 4<br />
c<strong>on</strong>tacts/m<strong>on</strong>th reduced over<br />
time, period <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> house arrest<br />
followed by curfew, mandatory<br />
40 hours/week <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> work, drug<br />
treatment or educati<strong>on</strong>, random<br />
weekly drug tests.<br />
20:1 caseload, about 10<br />
c<strong>on</strong>tacts a m<strong>on</strong>th, drug testing,<br />
treatment referrals, probati<strong>on</strong><br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>ficers trained in CBT.<br />
25:1 caseload, 1-2 c<strong>on</strong>tacts per<br />
week, drug testing/treatment,<br />
home and <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>fice visits,<br />
brokerage for needs assessment<br />
and services.<br />
Parole with enhanced routine<br />
unscheduled drug testing<br />
requirements: 1 every week in<br />
first 90 days <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> parole then<br />
biweekly.<br />
Comparis<strong>on</strong><br />
Regular parole<br />
supervisi<strong>on</strong>.<br />
Larger<br />
caseloads,<br />
fewer c<strong>on</strong>tacts<br />
(approx. 3 per<br />
m<strong>on</strong>th).<br />
100-200:1<br />
caseload, less<br />
frequent c<strong>on</strong>tact<br />
(about half that<br />
in treatment<br />
group), no<br />
services.<br />
200:1 caseload,<br />
less frequent<br />
c<strong>on</strong>tacts (about<br />
half the number<br />
in the treatment<br />
group, no<br />
services).<br />
Routine parole<br />
with drug<br />
testing <strong>on</strong>ly<br />
after arrest.<br />
Outcome<br />
Treatment group<br />
less likely to fail<br />
<strong>on</strong> technical<br />
violati<strong>on</strong>s and<br />
arrests; slightly<br />
more likely <strong>on</strong><br />
c<strong>on</strong>victi<strong>on</strong>s.<br />
Treatment group<br />
more likely to<br />
fail <strong>on</strong> technical<br />
violati<strong>on</strong>s but<br />
less likely to fail<br />
<strong>on</strong> arrests.<br />
Treatment group<br />
more likely to<br />
fail <strong>on</strong> technical<br />
violati<strong>on</strong>s but<br />
less likely to fail<br />
<strong>on</strong> arrests.<br />
Treatment group<br />
more likely to<br />
fail <strong>on</strong> new<br />
arrests.<br />
200