The Effects of Sanction Intensity on Criminal Conduct - JDAI Helpdesk
The Effects of Sanction Intensity on Criminal Conduct - JDAI Helpdesk
The Effects of Sanction Intensity on Criminal Conduct - JDAI Helpdesk
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
weight informati<strong>on</strong> in an appropriate manner. Furthermore, clinical predicti<strong>on</strong> is not<br />
standardized. B<strong>on</strong>ta (1996) notes that clinical decisi<strong>on</strong> rules are not easily observable or<br />
replicable.<br />
This is not to say that clinical predicti<strong>on</strong>s are not useful, nor that statistical<br />
predicti<strong>on</strong> methods are without flaws.<br />
Statistical predicti<strong>on</strong>s by definiti<strong>on</strong> provide<br />
average results, and the experience <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> criminal justice pr<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>essi<strong>on</strong>als plays an important<br />
role in highlighting deviati<strong>on</strong>s from the mean. In fact, pr<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>essi<strong>on</strong>al override is the littlediscussed<br />
fourth ‘principle <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> effective interventi<strong>on</strong>’ (Andrews, B<strong>on</strong>ta, & Hoge, 1990).<br />
Some critics <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> statistical models have also pointed out the ethical c<strong>on</strong>cerns about<br />
imposing such impers<strong>on</strong>al judgments <strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>fenders with individualized needs (see<br />
Gottfreds<strong>on</strong> & Jarjoura, 1996, for a review <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the criticisms <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> statistical models). One<br />
important and much-discussed ethical c<strong>on</strong>cern about risk predicti<strong>on</strong> highlighted by<br />
Gottfreds<strong>on</strong> and Jarjoura is that many risk factors <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> crime are highly correlated with<br />
race. This makes agency staff fearful <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> taking them into account in decisi<strong>on</strong> making.<br />
However, Gottfreds<strong>on</strong> and Moriarty (2006) defend statistical risk assessment, noting its<br />
importance at the “nexus <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> research and practice,” and pointing out that: “Properly<br />
developed and implemented, risk assessment devices can impose criminal justice<br />
decisi<strong>on</strong> making, properly target and potentially save resources, and potentially increase<br />
the public safety” (p. 195). Gottfreds<strong>on</strong> and Jarjoura (ibid.) also set out a soluti<strong>on</strong> for<br />
reducing the bias in risk assessment. Although the role <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> pr<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>essi<strong>on</strong>al override cannot<br />
be discounted, both papers argue that ignoring important predictive variables because <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />
ethical c<strong>on</strong>cerns, rather than investigating how predicti<strong>on</strong> instruments can empirically<br />
deal with these difficult issues, severely limits the utility <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> predictive devices and thus<br />
136