The Effects of Sanction Intensity on Criminal Conduct - JDAI Helpdesk
The Effects of Sanction Intensity on Criminal Conduct - JDAI Helpdesk
The Effects of Sanction Intensity on Criminal Conduct - JDAI Helpdesk
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Articles C<strong>on</strong>taining Supplementary Details <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Included Studies<br />
Main Study Reference<br />
Deschenes, Turner, &<br />
Petersilia (1995)<br />
Fagan & Reinarman<br />
(1986)<br />
Folkard, Smith, &<br />
Smith (1976)<br />
Guydish et al. (2008)<br />
Pears<strong>on</strong> (1988)<br />
Additi<strong>on</strong>al Documents<br />
Deschenes et al. (1995). A dual experiment in intensive<br />
community supervisi<strong>on</strong>: Minnesota’s pris<strong>on</strong> diversi<strong>on</strong> and<br />
enhanced supervised release programs. Pris. J., 75, 330-56.<br />
Fagan & Reinarman (1991)<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> social c<strong>on</strong>text <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> intensive supervisi<strong>on</strong>: organizati<strong>on</strong>al<br />
and ecological influences <strong>on</strong> community treatment.<br />
In Armstr<strong>on</strong>g (ed.): Intensive interventi<strong>on</strong>s with high-risk<br />
youths: promising approaches in juvenile probati<strong>on</strong> and<br />
parole, 341-394.<br />
Folkard et al. (1974). IMPACT Intensive Matched<br />
Probati<strong>on</strong> and After-Care Treatment. Volume I: <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> design<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the probati<strong>on</strong> experiment and an interim evaluati<strong>on</strong>.<br />
Home Office Research Study 24. L<strong>on</strong>d<strong>on</strong>: HMSO.<br />
Chan et al. (2005). Evaluati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> Probati<strong>on</strong> Case<br />
Management (PCM) for drug-involved women <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>fenders.<br />
Crime & Delinquency, 51, 447-69.<br />
Pears<strong>on</strong> (1985). New Jersey’s Intensive Supervisi<strong>on</strong><br />
Program: a progress report. Crime & Delinquency, 31, 393-<br />
410.<br />
Pears<strong>on</strong> & Bibel (1986). New Jersey’s Intensive<br />
Supervisi<strong>on</strong> Program: What is it like? How is it working?<br />
Fed. Prob. 50, 25-31.<br />
Petersilia & Turner<br />
(1990)<br />
Pears<strong>on</strong> (1987). Final report <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> research <strong>on</strong> New Jersey’s<br />
Intensive Supervisi<strong>on</strong> Program. Rutgers University.<br />
Petersilia (1989). Implementing randomized experiments:<br />
less<strong>on</strong>s from BJA’s intensive supervisi<strong>on</strong> project. Eval.<br />
Rev., 13, 435-458.<br />
Petersilia & Turner (1990). Comparing intensive and<br />
regular supervisi<strong>on</strong> for high-risk probati<strong>on</strong>ers: early results<br />
from an experiment in California. Crime & Delinq., 36, 87-<br />
111.<br />
Petersilia & Turner (1991). An evaluati<strong>on</strong> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> intensive<br />
probati<strong>on</strong> in California. J. Crim. L. Criminol., 82, 610-58.<br />
Petersilia, Turner, &<br />
Deschenes (1992b)<br />
Petersilia & Turner (1993). Intensive probati<strong>on</strong> and<br />
parole. Crime & Just., 17, 281-335.<br />
Petersilia, Turner, & Deschenes (1992). <str<strong>on</strong>g>The</str<strong>on</strong>g> costs and<br />
effects <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> intensive supervisi<strong>on</strong> for drug <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>fenders.<br />
207