05.08.2014 Views

Agilent Spectrum Analysis Basics - Agilent Technologies

Agilent Spectrum Analysis Basics - Agilent Technologies

Agilent Spectrum Analysis Basics - Agilent Technologies

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Sometimes third-order performance is given as TOI (third-order intercept).<br />

This is the mixer level at which the internally generated third-order distortion<br />

would be equal to the fundamental(s), or 0 dBc. This situation cannot be<br />

realized in practice because the mixer would be well into saturation.<br />

However, from a mathematical standpoint, TOI is a perfectly good data<br />

point because we know the slope of the line. So even with TOI as a starting<br />

point, we can still determine the degree of internally generated distortion<br />

at a given mixer level.<br />

We can calculate TOI from data sheet information. Because third-order<br />

dynamic range changes 2 dB for every dB change in the level of the<br />

fundamental tone(s) at the mixer, we get TOI by subtracting half of the<br />

specified dynamic range in dBc from the level of the fundamental(s):<br />

TOI = A fund – d/2<br />

where<br />

A fund = level of the fundamental in dBm<br />

d = difference in dBc between fundamental and distortion<br />

Using the values from the previous discussion:<br />

TOI = –30 dBm – (–85 dBc)/2 = +12.5 dBm<br />

Attenuator test<br />

Understanding the distortion graph is important, but we can use a simple<br />

test to determine whether displayed distortion components are true input<br />

signals or internally generated signals. Change the input attenuator. If<br />

the displayed value of the distortion components remains the same, the<br />

components are part of the input signal. If the displayed value changes, the<br />

distortion components are generated internally or are the sum of external<br />

and internally generated signals. We continue changing the attenuator until<br />

the displayed distortion does not change and then complete the measurement.<br />

Noise<br />

There is another constraint on dynamic range, and that is the noise floor of<br />

our spectrum analyzer. Going back to our definition of dynamic range as the<br />

ratio of the largest to the smallest signal that we can measure, the average<br />

noise of our spectrum analyzer puts the limit on the smaller signal. So<br />

dynamic range versus noise becomes signal-to-noise ratio in which the<br />

signal is the fundamental whose distortion we wish to measure.<br />

We can easily plot noise on our dynamic range chart. For example, suppose<br />

that the data sheet for our spectrum analyzer specifies a displayed average<br />

noise level of –110 dBm in a 10 kHz resolution bandwidth. If our signal<br />

fundamental has a level of –40 dBm at the mixer, it is 70 dB above the<br />

average noise, so we have a 70 dB signal-to-noise ratio. For every dB that<br />

we reduce the signal level at the mixer, we lose 1 dB of signal-to-noise ratio.<br />

Our noise curve is a straight line having a slope of –1, as shown in Figure 6-2.<br />

If we ignore measurement accuracy considerations for a moment, the best<br />

dynamic range will occur at the intersection of the appropriate distortion<br />

curve and the noise curve. Figure 6-2 tells us that our maximum dynamic<br />

range for second-order distortion is 72.5 dB; for third-order distortion,<br />

81.7 dB. In practice, the intersection of the noise and distortion graphs is<br />

not a sharply defined point, because noise adds to the CW-like distortion<br />

products, reducing dynamic range by 2 dB when using the log power scale<br />

with log scale averaging.<br />

74

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!