Agilent Spectrum Analysis Basics - Agilent Technologies
Agilent Spectrum Analysis Basics - Agilent Technologies
Agilent Spectrum Analysis Basics - Agilent Technologies
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Amplitude calibration<br />
So far, we have looked at how a harmonic mixing spectrum analyzer responds<br />
to various input frequencies. What about amplitude?<br />
The conversion loss of a mixer is a function of harmonic number, and the<br />
loss goes up as the harmonic number goes up. This means that signals of<br />
equal amplitude would appear at different levels on the display if they<br />
involved different mixing modes. To preserve amplitude calibration, then,<br />
something must be done. In <strong>Agilent</strong> spectrum analyzers, the IF gain is<br />
changed. The increased conversion loss at higher LO harmonics causes a<br />
loss of sensitivity just as if we had increased the input attenuator. And since<br />
the IF gain change occurs after the conversion loss, the gain change is<br />
reflected by a corresponding change in the displayed noise level. So we<br />
can determine analyzer sensitivity on the harmonic-mixing ranges by noting<br />
the average displayed noise level just as we did on fundamental mixing.<br />
In older spectrum analyzers, the increase in displayed average noise level<br />
with each harmonic band was very noticeable. More recent models of <strong>Agilent</strong><br />
spectrum analyzers use a double-balanced, image-enhanced harmonic mixer<br />
to minimize the increased conversion loss when using higher harmonics.<br />
Thus, the “stair step” effect on DANL has been replaced by a gentle sloping<br />
increase with higher frequencies. This can be seen in Figure 7-9.<br />
Figure 7-9. Rise in noise floor indicates changes in sensitivity with<br />
changes in LO harmonic used<br />
Phase noise<br />
In Chapter 2, we noted that instability of an analyzer LO appears as phase<br />
noise around signals that are displayed far enough above the noise floor.<br />
We also noted that this phase noise can impose a limit on our ability to<br />
measure closely spaced signals that differ in amplitude. The level of the phase<br />
noise indicates the angular, or frequency, deviation of the LO. What happens<br />
to phase noise when a harmonic of the LO is used in the mixing process?<br />
Relative to fundamental mixing, phase noise (in decibels) increases by:<br />
where<br />
20 log(N),<br />
N = harmonic of the LO<br />
91