05.08.2014 Views

Agilent Spectrum Analysis Basics - Agilent Technologies

Agilent Spectrum Analysis Basics - Agilent Technologies

Agilent Spectrum Analysis Basics - Agilent Technologies

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Amplitude calibration<br />

So far, we have looked at how a harmonic mixing spectrum analyzer responds<br />

to various input frequencies. What about amplitude?<br />

The conversion loss of a mixer is a function of harmonic number, and the<br />

loss goes up as the harmonic number goes up. This means that signals of<br />

equal amplitude would appear at different levels on the display if they<br />

involved different mixing modes. To preserve amplitude calibration, then,<br />

something must be done. In <strong>Agilent</strong> spectrum analyzers, the IF gain is<br />

changed. The increased conversion loss at higher LO harmonics causes a<br />

loss of sensitivity just as if we had increased the input attenuator. And since<br />

the IF gain change occurs after the conversion loss, the gain change is<br />

reflected by a corresponding change in the displayed noise level. So we<br />

can determine analyzer sensitivity on the harmonic-mixing ranges by noting<br />

the average displayed noise level just as we did on fundamental mixing.<br />

In older spectrum analyzers, the increase in displayed average noise level<br />

with each harmonic band was very noticeable. More recent models of <strong>Agilent</strong><br />

spectrum analyzers use a double-balanced, image-enhanced harmonic mixer<br />

to minimize the increased conversion loss when using higher harmonics.<br />

Thus, the “stair step” effect on DANL has been replaced by a gentle sloping<br />

increase with higher frequencies. This can be seen in Figure 7-9.<br />

Figure 7-9. Rise in noise floor indicates changes in sensitivity with<br />

changes in LO harmonic used<br />

Phase noise<br />

In Chapter 2, we noted that instability of an analyzer LO appears as phase<br />

noise around signals that are displayed far enough above the noise floor.<br />

We also noted that this phase noise can impose a limit on our ability to<br />

measure closely spaced signals that differ in amplitude. The level of the phase<br />

noise indicates the angular, or frequency, deviation of the LO. What happens<br />

to phase noise when a harmonic of the LO is used in the mixing process?<br />

Relative to fundamental mixing, phase noise (in decibels) increases by:<br />

where<br />

20 log(N),<br />

N = harmonic of the LO<br />

91

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!