06.01.2015 Views

413047-Underground-Commercial-Sex-Economy

413047-Underground-Commercial-Sex-Economy

413047-Underground-Commercial-Sex-Economy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

In chapters three through eight, we refer to the individuals engaged in the commercial sex market as sex<br />

workers. According to Thukral, Ditmore, and Murphy (2005, 9), sex work is defined as “a term used to<br />

refer to all aspects of the lawful and unlawful sex industry.” The term “sex work” is frequently used to<br />

encompass the broad array of legal and illegal activities that take place in indoor and outdoor settings in<br />

the sex industry, ranging from stripping and dancing to streetwalking to working for escort, massage, and<br />

call services. Due to sex work’s broad definition, researchers have recognized the considerable diversity<br />

that exists among different types of commercial sex transactions and services. Murphy and Venkatesh<br />

(2006, 130) highlight this variability in their study of indoor sex workers, writing that while the<br />

individuals in their sample engaged in some form of sex work, the sex workers’ “working conditions, their<br />

client base, the specific place in which they conduct their work, their rate, etc. … all differ, depending on<br />

the specific type of sex work in which they are engaged. So, while the term sex worker denotes women<br />

who exchange sex for material goods, the condition under which this exchange is conducted varies<br />

greatly.”<br />

Scholars have drawn distinctions between indoor and outdoor sex work. Indoor sex work takes place in<br />

brothels, homes, strip clubs, and bars, and includes escort and massage services as well as fetish work,<br />

including bondage, dominance, sadism and masochism (BDSM). Outdoor sex work encompasses street<br />

work that occurs in public spaces, hotels, motels, and cars.<br />

Many scholars use the terms “prostitution” and “sex work” interchangeably as a generic term for any<br />

individual who exchanges a sexual act for something of value. Murphy and Venkatesh (2006, 129) define<br />

sex workers as “anyone who exchanges sexual intercourse (including oral sex) for money or some other<br />

material good.” The National Institute of Justice defines “prostitution” similarly, as “the offering of<br />

something of value in exchange for sexual activity. By definition, prostitution is a form of<br />

commodification, which in this context is the belief that women generally and/or sexual activity<br />

specifically are commercial products” (Moses 2006). <strong>Sex</strong>ual acts are exchanged for a number of items of<br />

value, including but not limited to, money, drugs, or other desired objects (Dalla 2000; Schauer and<br />

Wheaton 2006).<br />

Research Design<br />

We used quantitative and qualitative data collection methodologies to answer the research questions<br />

outlined above. In order to estimate the size of the UCSE in each study site, we estimated the changes in<br />

the markets for illegal drugs and weapons over time, and how they differed across sites. This was done by<br />

measuring changes in a series of “proxy” variables, which we assumed to be proportional to underlying<br />

activity. Thus, official national datasets 15 that measured some sort of drug and gun activities over a period<br />

of time were collected to measure these changes.<br />

We collected qualitative data through interviews with local and federal law enforcement and prosecutors,<br />

as well as interviews with convicted traffickers, pimps, and child pornographers, and sex workers involved<br />

in court diversion programming, to help us understand the structure and network ties of the underground<br />

commercial sex economy at local, state, and interstate levels. We also used the interviews with pimps,<br />

traffickers, and sex workers to quantify the amount of profits generated through the UCSE and to create<br />

overall UCSE estimates by city.<br />

Site Selection Process<br />

We employed a targeted, purposive sample of urban areas as study sites for a number of reasons. First, it<br />

allowed us to efficiently direct sampling resources. Second, with the exception of Internet-based<br />

commerce, the underground commercial sex trade is known to be a phenomenon that is largely<br />

concentrated, and most likely observed, in urban settings. 16 We also assumed that convicted traffickers,<br />

15 These datasets included the National Survey of Drug Use and Health (NSDUH); Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System<br />

(YRBSS); Drug Abuse Warning Network (DAWN), Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, and Firearms (ATF); and National Vital Statistics<br />

data (NVSS).<br />

16 Focusing only on major cities precludes a nationally representative sample, but because major cities have more experience with<br />

cases involving the UCSE and richer data than non-urban areas, this trade-off is justified (Newton et al. 2008).<br />

10

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!