413047-Underground-Commercial-Sex-Economy

Note that the entries in the tables below are derived directly from the values of the Other Proxy as listed in
Table 3.7 Final Values of Proxy .
Table 3.18 Cross-City Other Proxy Ratios
2003 Atlanta Dallas Denver Miami San Diego Seattle DC
Atlanta 1.00 1.17 0.52 1.06 0.59 0.67 1.02
Dallas 0.86 1.00 0.44 0.91 0.50 0.57 0.87
Denver 1.94 2.26 1.00 2.06 1.14 1.30 1.98
Miami 0.94 1.10 0.49 1.00 0.55 0.63 0.96
San Diego 1.71 1.99 0.88 1.81 1.00 1.14 1.74
Seattle 1.49 1.74 0.77 1.58 0.88 1.00 1.52
DC 0.98 1.14 0.51 1.04 0.58 0.66 1.00
2007 Atlanta Dallas Denver Miami San Diego Seattle DC
Atlanta 1.00 1.18 0.43 0.92 0.51 0.62 1.05
Dallas 0.85 1.00 0.36 0.78 0.43 0.52 0.89
Denver 2.33 2.76 1.00 2.14 1.18 1.45 2.45
Miami 1.09 1.29 0.47 1.00 0.55 0.68 1.15
San Diego 1.97 2.33 0.85 1.81 1.00 1.22 2.08
Seattle 1.61 1.90 0.69 1.48 0.82 1.00 1.70
DC 0.95 1.12 0.41 0.87 0.48 0.59 1.00
1.4.5. Positivity Constraints
Table 3.19 Cross-Year Other Proxy Ratios
City 2007/2003
Atlanta 1.17
Dallas 1.18
Denver 0.97
Miami 1.01
San Diego 1.01
Seattle 1.08
DC 1.20
Finally, sufficient reasoning about the semantics of the variables yields additional constraints requiring
that their values be positive and well-separated from 0. Toward this, for each city and choice of
time index , we have
46