413047-Underground-Commercial-Sex-Economy
413047-Underground-Commercial-Sex-Economy
413047-Underground-Commercial-Sex-Economy
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Pimpin’ is not no competition sport … [We] always network and help each other out. We<br />
are the masses and everyone is against the pimp. A lot of people think we are bad people.<br />
I may have a better idea than the next man, think different, but that don’t make me a bad<br />
person. (D5)<br />
Respondents who networked with other pimps often opined that they received more loyalty from their<br />
male counterparts than female employees. One respondent explained that he never attempted to recruit<br />
employees from his pimp friends: “If I mess with the pimp, I don’t mess with the ho. I would rather have a<br />
good pimp friend for life than a prostitute for two years. Because they do leave” (E2).<br />
In addition, prior studies have revealed that some pimps trade, exchange, or sell and buy women among<br />
themselves (Hughes 2000; Raphael and Myers-Powell 2009; Wilson and Dalton 2007). These findings<br />
were corroborated by a few respondents who traded or sold employees with other pimps. 62 The exchange<br />
of employees could benefit the business interests of both pimps involved and was used at times to<br />
discourage employee independence. Pimps were able to solidify supportive relationships with one another<br />
by trading or lending employees. A respondent noted, “If a guy don’t have a girl he can always borrow one,<br />
give it to him she’s yours” (E2).<br />
At other times, a financial transaction would take place between pimps. One pimp explained: “I would sell<br />
girls [to other pimps], too. Say he needs someone and then they come to me, I’d find them for him … He’d<br />
give me $5,000 dollars for a girl” (A4). Another respondent reported that he would occasionally purchase<br />
employees from other competitors:<br />
Interviewer: Did you work with competitors<br />
Respondent: No, not really. Sometimes I would talk to them and if they were going to<br />
fire one girl, I’d hire them. Sometimes I’d pay money for them, $500 to $1,000. Every<br />
three or four months. Three times a year, not real often. I’d do the same. If I had a<br />
problem with a girl, I’d call someone up to maybe work it out. (A1)<br />
One interviewee reported a code of conduct surrounding the trade and purchase of employees between<br />
pimps:<br />
The code of the streets is if she’s already involved with somebody, at that point if she<br />
choose to be with me, with all the money she got on her then, it’s his. I respect that. She<br />
has to turn it over to me anyway, so I am going to give him all that prior to being with me.<br />
I’m going to call him and let him know. (D13)<br />
As law enforcement has also observed, pimps trade employees with one another or even “give” an<br />
employee to another pimp. A respondent explained, “A pimp partner is going to last way longer [than an<br />
employee]. Before I put a partner on the floor, the bitch is on the floor. If he is really good, you might<br />
shoot him a bitch” (B3). Trades were not always permanent, and pimps described a process of “sharing<br />
employees.” When asked if he worked with business partners, one pimp responded, “For a while. I<br />
wouldn’t even call them business partners. Just associates. They just help out a little bit, show you the ins<br />
and outs. Whatever you make you keep to yourself. Take her for a couple days, share her for a couple<br />
days” (E15). Sharing employees could also provide means to remove employees from their support<br />
systems and force them to rely more fully on the pimp:<br />
They trade girls [without paying fees]. It just be like trading match cards, the girls have no<br />
say so. Or it can get to the point, “I know the runaway is running away from here, so she<br />
can’t work here. Do you want to trade so she can work somewhere else” Also cause she’ll<br />
have someone to run back to. If you take someone away from their support, now they<br />
have no one to depend on. They wake up and have no one else, so they’re stuck. (G8)<br />
When trades occurred, they were usually used coercively to extract individuals from their support systems<br />
or remove employees who presented management difficulties for the pimp.<br />
62 While this study’s interview protocol did not focus explicitly on the trade and purchase of employees from other pimps, it did ask<br />
pimps to report how new employees were found.<br />
183