06.01.2015 Views

413047-Underground-Commercial-Sex-Economy

413047-Underground-Commercial-Sex-Economy

413047-Underground-Commercial-Sex-Economy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Finding 6: For offenders, the prevalence of online child pornography<br />

communities reinforces and normalizes child pornography offenses.<br />

Over half of the offenders interviewed were members of online child pornography communities. These<br />

communities allow offenders to be around like-minded individuals, share child pornography content, and<br />

discuss fantasies, which may involve first-hand contact with children. Online child pornography<br />

communities also allow individuals to communicate with one another under a cloak of anonymity. Both<br />

law enforcement officials and offenders agreed that these communities help to reinforce and normalize<br />

the trading and downloading of child pornography, and in some cases, even pressured individuals to<br />

produce their own content in order to be more accepted by the community.<br />

According to law enforcement officers and offenders, online child pornography communities are typically<br />

very structured and are often run by a moderator. Moderators are tasked with screening individuals<br />

interested in joining the community and frequently have final say as to who is welcomed into the group.<br />

They also monitor the content shared and are responsible for taking down the host site or community<br />

board and moving it elsewhere if there is a fear of law enforcement detection. In some cases, the site that<br />

hosts the online child pornography message board or groups might also host other types of content and<br />

claim ignorance if questioned by law enforcement about the child pornography content. Stakeholders<br />

stated that it was rare for them to go after these website owners since it was difficult to prove that they<br />

knowingly hosted illegal content.<br />

Policy Implications<br />

Law enforcement should prioritize investigations of individuals or businesses that host and/or support<br />

online communities. Informing an individual they are blocked from their website due to a pending child<br />

pornography investigation (as one offender described in chapter nine) should be stopped since it could<br />

provide that person with enough time to delete evidence and ultimately dismantle the investigation. In<br />

addition to being held criminally responsible, facilitators should also be ordered to pay restitution to the<br />

victims of the child pornography, especially since some are profiting from online child pornography<br />

communities.<br />

Finding 7: Due to resource limitations, the least technologically savvy<br />

offenders are most likely to be detected.<br />

Both stakeholders and inmates described a variation in collecting behavior and networking levels across<br />

Internet child pornography offenders. While some offenders are technologically sophisticated, sharing<br />

strategies to evade law enforcement within structured trading networks, other offenders described<br />

themselves as “point and click,” using rudimentary methods to download, store, and share child<br />

pornography.<br />

Stakeholders shared frustration that they are unable to devote the time and resources necessary to<br />

investigate technologically advanced offenders, who law enforcement reported are often responsible for<br />

producing child pornography. Instead, law enforcement frequently focuses on offenders with the least<br />

technological expertise. As Jenkins (2001, 143) notes, “The vast bulk of arrests still involve low-level or<br />

plainly careless perpetrators, and this is likely to remain the case for the foreseeable future.” Offenders<br />

were aware of law enforcements’ lack of capacity and they felt a sense of security that advanced techniques<br />

would help offenders evade detection.<br />

Policy Implications<br />

Due to constantly evolving technology, more resources should be invested in law enforcement to stay up<br />

to date on new methods. Additionally, the criminal justice system should properly distinguish between<br />

low-level and serious child pornography offenders. As a 2012 United States Sentencing Commissions<br />

report (ii) notes, the “existing sentencing scheme in non-production cases no longer adequately<br />

distinguishes among offenders based on their degrees of culpability.” Sentencing enhancements routinely<br />

apply to most offenders, largely because they were developed when child pornography was acquired<br />

through the mail (United States Sentencing Commission 2012, iii). Adopting the Sentencing<br />

292

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!