413047-Underground-Commercial-Sex-Economy
413047-Underground-Commercial-Sex-Economy
413047-Underground-Commercial-Sex-Economy
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Almost half the sample (n=10, 48 percent) indicated that they were not looking for child pornography, but<br />
rather passively “stumbled across” it. As one respondent recounted, “I didn’t have any interest in child<br />
pornography before I went on the Internet” (C6). Seven of the respondents, 33 percent of the sample,<br />
discovered child pornography when looking for adult pornography:<br />
It was an accident actually, I was looking for other types of porn. I didn’t look for it, I<br />
came across it. Holy shit, this is horrible, but it’s great, but it’s horrible. Like any other<br />
addiction, look at it for the rush. (A12)<br />
For these respondents who did not actively seek out child pornography, curiosity was mentioned as<br />
offenders’ primary impetus for initially viewing the material. This was often supplemented by the<br />
perceived “thrill” of viewing child pornography. One respondent described his curiosity when he came<br />
across newsgroups with explicit titles related to child pornography, which led to further fixation:<br />
Cost<br />
You see the names of the groups, and think that can’t be real … I looked in there and was<br />
surprised because they were actually real … It was a gradual process. You look at them,<br />
you go look for some more. Pretty soon it becomes an obsession like anything. (A11)<br />
The availability of free child pornography has resulted in an unwillingness to pay for images and distrust<br />
of anyone who charges for material. In the sample, only one individual (5 percent) had ever purchased<br />
child pornography, though seven individuals (33 percent) paid for services to support downloading child<br />
pornography. These expenses included fees for creating or upgrading P2P or newsgroup accounts, as well<br />
as anonymizer services to ensure privacy. One respondent explained this distinction:<br />
I have paid for the method by which I collected child pornography. I’ve never paid for a<br />
picture or video. I paid for access to the people I communicated with. (C7)<br />
Some websites required users to pay to for a password in order to access a site. Offenders cited these fees<br />
as ranging from $10 a month to $30 a week, though they could circumvent these fees by networking with<br />
administrators, who would supply free usernames and passwords. Webb, Craissati, and Keen (2007)<br />
found that nearly half of London-area Internet child pornography sex offenders in their sample reported<br />
paying to view images, though they do not specify if this payment was for pornographic material or to<br />
access file sharing programs.<br />
Law enforcement reported that some individuals use alternative means to pay for child pornography,<br />
including child pornographers creating Amazon wish lists that others will buy gifts from in exchange for<br />
images. Other individuals may also send gifts to children through the mail to entice them into sending<br />
images or videos of themselves.<br />
With the abundance of free material, offenders were suspicious of websites or individuals that charged for<br />
material. When asked if he had ever paid for child pornography, one respondent answered, “The most<br />
basic way I can say it is ‘Why pay’ … I guess I just assumed that anyone asking for money was a sting”<br />
(A6). Other offenders had similar responses, indicating they expected that any site or individual who<br />
charged for child pornography was either law enforcement or a scam. As Jenkins (2001, 91) reports,<br />
“There are instances in which money changes hands and videos are sold, but many web sites that demand<br />
payment for access are bogus, and anyone gullible enough to pay will, if he is lucky, just lose the price of<br />
admission; if he is less fortunate, he will have earned a visit from the FBI.”<br />
Purchasing pornographic material may also affect how an individual perceives their involvement in an<br />
illegal activity. When asked if he ever paid for child pornography, one offender replied, “I couldn’t see<br />
myself doing that. It seemed wrong on a different level” (D1). Without the exchange of money, another<br />
offender did not see his actions as supporting child abuse:<br />
It’s like when you’re buying drugs you’re supporting crime or supporting terrorism. They<br />
aren’t getting any money from me to do any bad things or other things. (B1)<br />
259